Cementless stem fixation and primary stability under physiological-like loads in vitro.

Primary stability and in consequence osteointegration are commonly related to the stem anchorage but also to the complex musculoskeletal loading of the hip region. This study investigated the influence of metaphyseal and meta-diaphyseal anchorage on the primary stability of cementless stems under physiological-like loading in vitro. Metaphyseal and meta-diaphyseal anchoring stems (n=6 each) were implanted into composite femora. Musculoskeletal loads, validated by in vivo data (peak joint force 2348 N), were applied using a mechanical set-up. Interface movements were recorded by seven displacement transducers and primary stability was compared. Both stems exhibited similar movement patterns and principally moved distally with a retroversional twist. Although elastic movements were comparable, the metaphyseal stem exhibited higher plastic deformations than the meta-diaphyseal stem, particularly for the metaphyseal, medio-lateral and antero-posterior components. Under physiological-like loading, the metaphyseal stem allowed higher interface movements and tended to initially migrate faster than the meta-diaphyseal stem and then stabilized. Elastic movements were comparable and seemed to be less influenced by the anchoring concept than by the mechanical properties of the bone. The analyses emphasize the importance of metaphyseal bone in proximal anchorage and the necessity of an accurate canal preparation to prevent excessive initial migration.