Literature DB >> 16429704

Effects of different retraction medicaments on gingival tissue.

Eralp A Akca1, Erhan Yildirim, Mehmet Dalkiz, Hüsnü Yavuzyilmaz, Bedri Beydemir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Exposure of the gingival sulcus and control of hemorrhage are prerequisites to the treatment of cervical lesions and improving the quality of impressions prior to fabricating indirect restorations. Gingival retraction cords saturated with different medicaments are widely used for this purpose. However, the long-term effects of the chemicals in gingival tissues are not clear. The purpose of this study was to compare the histopathologic effects of 2 different retraction solutions in gingival tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this in vivo study, a solution of 10% aluminum chloride and a solution of 15.5% ferric sulfate were used as retraction medicament in dogs. The saturated cords were allowed to remain in the gingival sulcus of the dogs for 3 minutes. After the removal of the cords, gingival biopsies were taken at 30 minutes, 24 hours, 7 days, and 12 days. For all specimens, histologic evaluation was performed by light microscopy to determine the degree of epithelial loss, alteration of the connective tissue, and inflammation.
RESULTS: Histopathologic examination of gingival tissue revealed that the ferric sulfate solution caused significant changes in gingival tissues at the beginning. However, the tissue returned to its normal histologic appearance at the end of day 12.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that the biologic effects of ferric sulfate solution are more satisfactory than aluminum chloride solution. However, both medicaments are reliable and can be used in gingival retraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16429704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Beyza Ünalan Değirmenci; Beyza Karadağ Naldemir; Alperen Değirmenci
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.

Authors:  Marko Igic; Milena Kostic; Jelena Basic; Nebojsa Krunic; Ana Pejcic; Nikola Gligorijevic; Aleksandra Milic Lemic
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Inflammatory response of canine gingiva to a chemical retraction agent placed at different time intervals.

Authors:  Asadallah Ahmadzadeh; Naim Erfani Majd; Joseph Chasteen; Azita Kaviani; Mohammad Amin Kavoosi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

Review 4.  Clinical applications of ferric sulfate in dentistry: A narrative review.

Authors:  Madhuri Bandi; Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni; Sivakumar Nuvvula
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

5.  In vitro effects of vasoconstrictive retraction agents on primary human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Danuta Nowakowska; Jolanta Saczko; Anna Szewczyk; Olga Michel; Marek Ziętek; Joanna Weżgowiec; Włodzimierz Więckiewicz; Julita Kulbacka
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry.

Authors:  Pardis Tarighi; Maryam Khoroushi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-07

7.  Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.

Authors:  Kirti Jajoo Shrivastava; Anjali Bhoyar; Surendra Agarwal; Saurabh Shrivastava; Swapnil Parlani; Varsha Murthy
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.