Literature DB >> 16429187

In vitro evaluation of the retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts luted with glass ionomer and resin cements.

Shivaughn Marchan1, Larry Coldero, Robert Whiting, Salvacion Barclay.   

Abstract

The retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts (CosmoPost system) luted with glass ionomer and resin cements was evaluated. Thirty-two extracted, caries-free, unrestored teeth were selected and stored in chlorhexidine and water solution. The teeth were endodontically treated and randomly assigned to two groups (n=16). Each tooth was decoronated and prepared to a depth of 10.0 mm from root surface to receive a 1.4 mm diameter zirconium dioxide post. Each group had posts cemented with either glass ionomer cement (Fuji I) or resin cement (Variolink II). The post/teeth specimens were embedded in resin blocks and subjected to tensile testing. The tensile force required to dislodge the cemented posts in a tensile testing machine was recorded. The mean stress values of both groups were analyzed for statistical differences using ANOVA and Student's t-test. Significance level was set at 5%. Mean peak forces at failure (N) and standard deviation for the tested cements were the following: Fuji I = 121.8 (+/-17.4) and Variolink II = 228.1 (+/-36.8). Posts luted with the resin cement presented statistically significant higher tensile bond strength than those retained with glass ionomer (p<0.05). It may be concluded that zirconia posts cemented with resin-based cement (Variolink II) failed at statistically significant higher values compared to those cemented with glass ionomer cement (Fuji I). Regardless of the cement type, the posts failed adhesively at the cement/post interface when subjected to a tensile force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16429187     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402005000300008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  4 in total

1.  Bond strength of three luting agents to zirconia ceramic - influence of surface treatment and thermocycling.

Authors:  Ahmed Attia
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 2.  Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.

Authors:  Safoura Ghodsi; Mohammad Mostafa Aghamohseni; Sarah Arzani; Sasan Rasaeipour; Mina Shekarian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-07-18

3.  Effect of Two Different Surface Treatments on Retention of Cosmopost with Two Different Core Materials.

Authors:  Mohamed A Qudaih; Salah A Yousief; Mahmoud N M Allabban; Ali Abkar Mohammed Nejri; Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-03-30

4.  Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Jefferson Ricardo Pereira; Ricardo Abreu da Rosa; Marcus Vinícius Reis Só; Daniele Afonso; Milton Carlos Kuga; Heitor Marques Honório; Accácio Lins do Valle; Hugo Alberto Vidotti
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.