Literature DB >> 16429181

Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.

José Roberto Vanni1, Roberto Santos, Orlando Limongi, Danilo M Zanello Guerisoli, Alexandre Capelli, Jesus Djalma Pécora.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of cervical preflaring on determination of the initial apical file in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. Fifty first molars with degree of curvature of the mesiobuccal root between 10 degrees and 15 degrees were utilized. After standard access opening and removal of pulp tissue, the working length (WL) was determined at 1 mm from the root apex. Five groups (n=10) were formed at random, according to the type of cervical preflaring performed. In group 1, the size of the initial apical file was determined without cervical preflaring. In groups 2 to 5, the cervical and middle thirds of the canals were preflared with Gates-Glidden drills, K3 Orifice Opener instruments, ProTaper instruments and LA Axxess burs, respectively. Canals were sized manually with K-files, starting with size 08 K-files, inserted passively up to the WL. File sizes were increased until a binding sensation was felt at the WL and the size of the file was recorded. The binding instruments were fixed into the canals at the WL with methylcyanacrylate. Cross-sections of the WL region were examined under scanning electron microscopy and the discrepancies between the canal diameter and the diameter of first file to bind at the WL were calculated using UTHSCSA ImageTool software. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey's HSD post-hoc test. Significant differences (p<0.001) were found among the groups. The major discrepancy was observed for the group without preflaring (mean 0.1543 mm +/- 0.0216). Cervical preflaring with LA Axxess burs produced the least discrepancies between the canal size and the diameter of the initial apical instrument (mean 0.026 mm +/- 0.0037), followed by ProTaper files (mean 0.0567 mm +/- 0.0354). Canals preflared with Gates-Glidden drills and K3 Orifice Opener instruments showed statistically similar discrepancy results to each other (p>0.05) (means 0.1167 mm +/- 0.0231 and 0.1313 mm +/- 0.0344, respectively). In conclusion, preflaring of the cervical and middle thirds improved the determination of the initial apical instrument. Canals preflared with LA Axxess burs showed a more accurate binding of the files to the anatomical diameter at the WL in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16429181     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402005000300002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  7 in total

1.  The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study.

Authors:  Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Laleh Mohammadian Bajgiran; Amirali Naghdi; Elaheh Behrooz; Zohreh Khalilak
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

2.  A Comparison of Apical Transportation in Severely Curved Canals Induced by Reciproc and BioRaCe Systems.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Nabavizadeh; Abbas Abbaszadegan; Leila Khojastepour; Mohsen Amirhosseini; Ebrahim Kiani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-03-08

3.  Influence of cervical preflaring using different rotary instruments on the accuracy of apical file size determination: A comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Shiv Aditya Sharma; Shashi Prabha Tyagi; Dakshita Joy Sinha; Udai Pratap Singh; Priyanka Chandra; Gagandeep Kaur
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-11

4.  Danger zone analysis using cone beam computed tomography after apical enlargement with K3 and K3XF in a manikin model.

Authors:  Juan-Gonzalo Olivier; Marc García-Font; Jose-Antonio Gonzalez-Sanchez; Miguel Roig-Cayon; Fernando Durán-Sindreu
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Working length changes in curved canals after coronal flaring by using rotary files and hand file: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar; Neha Khambete; Suvarna Patil; Upendra Hoshing; Ashish Medha; Roshan Shetty
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09

6.  The Efficacy of FlexMaster's IntroFile, PreRaCe and Gates Glidden Drills in Straight-Line Access: A CBCT Assessment.

Authors:  Narges Farhad Mollashahi; Mahdi Sohrabi; Leila Farhad Mollashahi; Mojdeh Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-07-05

7.  Influence of cervical preflaring and root canal preparation on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Paula Barcellos da Silva; Simone Ferreti Duarte; Murilo Priori Alcalde; Marco Antonio Húngaro Duarte; Rodrigo Ricci Vivan; Ricardo Abreu da Rosa; Marcus Vinícius Reis Só; Angela Longo do Nascimento
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.