Literature DB >> 16428996

Peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times: a comparison of 3 securement methods for implementation of a 96-hour scheduled change protocol.

Bonnie Smith1.   

Abstract

A prospective, sequential clinical trial was undertaken to determine whether any of 3 methods of peripheral IV catheter (PIV) securement could extend the average survival time of such catheters sufficiently to allow the implementation of a 96-hour PIV change-protocol. Nonsterile tape, StatLock, and Hub-Guard were evaluated. The use of nonsterile tape securement resulted in an 8% PIV survival rate, HubGuard produced a 9% PIV survival rate, and Statlock produced a 52% PIV survival rate (P<.001). Although this study was not a randomized, controlled trial, it strongly suggests that a mechanical catheter securement device, as opposed to tape or die-cut tape, can render practicable the implementation of the 96-hour PIV change protocol that was sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428996     DOI: 10.1097/00129804-200601000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infus Nurs        ISSN: 1533-1458


  10 in total

Review 1.  Venous access: a practical review for 2009.

Authors:  Edward Cheung; Mark O Baerlocher; Murray Asch; Andrew Myers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A Comparison of Two Commonly Used Methods for Securing Intravenous Cannulas.

Authors:  Susan Stace; Michael Symes; Mark Gillett
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 3.  A Primer and Literature Review on Internal and External Retention Mechanisms for Catheter Fixation.

Authors:  Christopher M Stevens; Kevin Malone; Deven Champaneri; Nick Gavin; Daniel Harper
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients--the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Claire M Rickard; Nicole Marsh; Joan Webster; E Geoffrey Playford; Matthew R McGrail; Emily Larsen; Samantha Keogh; David McMillan; Jennifer A Whitty; Md Abu Choudhury; Kimble R Dunster; Heather Reynolds; Andrea Marshall; Julia Crilly; Jeanine Young; Ogilvie Thom; John Gowardman; Amanda Corley; John F Fraser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Bundle approach used to achieve zero central line-associated bloodstream infections in an adult coronary intensive care unit.

Authors:  Poonam Gupta; Mincy Thomas; Ashfaq Patel; Reeba George; Leena Mathews; Seenu Alex; Siji John; Cherlyn Simbulan; Ma Leni Garcia; Sara Al-Balushi; Mawahib El Hassan
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-02

6.  Catheter securement systems: comparison of two investigational devices to a sutureless securement device, a securement dressing, and sutures in a pig model.

Authors:  Laura F Rutledge; Daniel P DeCabooter; Shelley-Ann H Walters; Stéphanie F Bernatchez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2015-08-27

7.  Catheter Securement Systems for Peripherally Inserted and Nontunneled Central Vascular Access Devices: Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Sutureless Device.

Authors:  Karen M Krenik; Graham E Smith; Stéphanie F Bernatchez
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

8.  Not "just" an intravenous line: Consumer perspectives on peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC). An international cross-sectional survey of 25 countries.

Authors:  Marie Cooke; Amanda J Ullman; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Marianne Wallis; Amanda Corley; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expert versus generalist inserters for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicole Marsh; Joan Webster; Emily Larsen; Jodie Genzel; Marie Cooke; Gabor Mihala; Sue Cadigan; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  A novel integrated dressing to secure peripheral intravenous catheters in an adult acute hospital: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicole Marsh; Emily Larsen; Jodie Genzel; Gabor Mihala; Amanda J Ullman; Tricia Kleidon; Sue Cadigan; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.