Literature DB >> 16428983

High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries using parallel imaging acquisition techniques at 3.0 T: initial experience.

Ulrich Kramer1, Kambiz Nael, Gerhard Laub, Glen K Nyborg, Michael Fenchel, Stephan Miller, Claus D Claussen, J Paul Finn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the kidneys at 3.0 T using parallel data acquisition.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced MRA of the renal arteries (RA) was performed in 12 volunteers and 12 consecutive patients (mean age 47.1 +/- 16.3 years) on a 3.0 T MR scanner. For CEMRA, a high-resolution 3-dimensional GRE FLASH sequence was implemented. Images were assessed subjectively on a 0 to 5 scoring scale by 2 reviewers. Quantitative evaluation was done by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was acquired in all individuals. In total, 62 RA were found, consisting of 48 main and 14 accessory RA. Overall visibility score for main RA was 4.82 +/- 0.38. RA were identified up to the third-order branches in 88%. In 3 of 12 patients, a hemodynamic relevant stenosis was found and proven by conventional angiogram.
CONCLUSION: CEMRA at 3.0 T is advantageous in terms of better SNR and T1 weighting; therefore, measurement time can be reduced and spatial resolution can be increased without corruption of signal yield. Consequently, high-field MRA may be preferred for the evaluation of renal vascular anatomy in potential kidney donors or for the detection of renal artery stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428983     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000195838.94440.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  10 in total

1.  Three-tesla MRI biphasic angiography: a method for preoperative assessment of the vascular supply in renal tumours: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Milan Hora; Petr Stránský; Ivan Trávníček; Tomáš Urge; Viktor Eret; Boris Kreuzberg; Jan Baxa; Hynek Mírka; Fredrik Petersson; Ondřej Hes; Jiří Ferda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Visualization of intrarenal vessels by 3.0-T MR angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography using renal specimens.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Schenk; Björn Friebe; Sebastian Ley; Klaus Baudendistel; Max Schoebinger; Stefan Hähnel; Arianeb Mehrabi; Jochen Tröger; Peter Hallscheidt
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-08-09

5.  Peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T, improved spatial resolution and low dose contrast: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Kambiz Nael; Mayil Krishnam; Ali Nael; Anthony Ton; Stefan G Ruehm; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Val M Runge; John N Morelli; Kenneth D Williams; L Gill Naul; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Assessment of the kidneys: magnetic resonance angiography, perfusion and diffusion.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; John N Morelli; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Authors:  Carsten W K P Arnoldussen; Pascale Notten; Rutger Brans; Dammis Vroegindeweij; Lidwine W Tick; Marlène H W van de Poel; Otmar R M Wikkeling; Louis-Jean Vleming; Ad Koster; Kon-Siong G Jie; Esther M G Jacobs; Nils Planken; Cees H A Wittens; Hugo Ten Cate; Joachim E Wildberger; Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 9.  Imaging the Renal Microcirculation in Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Katerina Apelt; Roel Bijkerk; Franck Lebrin; Ton J Rabelink
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Gadobutrol versus gadofosveset-trisodium in MR venography of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Carsten W K P Arnoldussen; Yeelai Lam; Nobutake Ito; Bjorn Winkens; M Eline Kooi; Cees H A Wittens; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.