Literature DB >> 16428564

Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients.

Farida Ithnin1, Yvonne Lim, Alex T Sia, Cecilia E Ocampo.   

Abstract

Combined spinal epidural (CSE) is an established technique for lower segment cesarean delivery. In this study we tested the hypothesis that the spinal block from a CSE technique results in a more extensive spread of local anesthetic in the subarachnoid space than the single-shot spinal (SSS) technique. We recruited 30 ASA physical status I parturients admitted for elective lower segment cesarean delivery into our randomized, controlled, double-blind study. All patients intrathecally received 2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The patients were randomized into one of the two groups using sealed opaque envelopes. Group S (n = 15) received a SSS technique. Group CS (n = 15) received a CSE technique using loss of resistance to 2 mL of air, but the epidural catheter was not inserted after the intrathecal drug administration. The maximal sensory block achieved in group CS was statistically higher than that in Group S (median C6 interquartile range, C5 to C8 versus median T3, T2 to T4, P < 0.001). Time taken to reach maximal sensory block was significantly longer in group CS. There were no differences in the time taken for the block to recede to T10, hemodynamic profile, or side effects. In conclusion, the CSE technique without placing an epidural catheter or administering epidural medication resulted in a significantly higher level of sensory block when compared with the SSS technique when the same dose of local anesthetic was given intrathecally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16428564     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195440.51717.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Effect of preloading epidural space with normal saline on the incidence of complications of epidural catheter placement and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Guiqi Geng; Xingfeng Sun; Shaoqiang Huang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Tang; Jie Zhou; Xiao-Hui Ren; Xue-Mei Lin
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 3.  Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Alicia T Dennis; Allan M Cyna; Matthew G Richardson; Matthew R Bright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review.

Authors:  H Virgin; E Oddby; J G Jakobsson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

5.  Abdominal girth and vertebral column length aid in predicting intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine dose for elective cesarean section.

Authors:  Chang-Na Wei; Qing-He Zhou; Li-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  A randomized double-blind comparison of the double-space technique versus the single-space technique in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Eun Hee Chun; Sooyoung Cho; Jae Hee Woo; Youn Jin Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.