Literature DB >> 16427926

Primary care physician attitudes toward endoscopic screening for GERD symptoms and unsedated esophagoscopy.

Vikram Boolchand1, Ashley Faulx, Ananya Das, Stephen Zyzanski, Gerard Isenberg, Gregory Cooper, Michael V Sivak, Amitabh Chak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend consideration of screening patients with chronic GERD for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Unsedated esophagoscopy (UE) is a less costly alternative to standard EGD for identifying BE. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for EGD referral, the barriers to screening, and the interest in performing UE.
METHODS: A one-page survey was mailed to a random sample of 500 family practitioners and 500 internists. This sample was obtained from the American Academy of Family Physicians and American Society of Internal Medicine (500 from each organization).
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 54%. The majority (78%) refer more than 50% of their GERD patients for EGD; however, 34% also refer more than 10% of their patients for barium studies. Primary care physicians cited alarm symptoms, refractory symptoms, and chronicity and severity of symptoms as the major indications for referral for EGD. Gender, age, obesity, and tobacco use were cited less frequently. Cost of endoscopy, poor patient acceptance, and lack of evidence were the most common reasons cited for not referring for EGD. A majority of respondents (62%) indicated that the availability of UE would increase referral for the procedure, and 52% would be willing to perform UE in their office.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe, refractory, and chronic symptoms are the primary reasons for endoscopic referral from primary care physicians who manage patients with GERD. Other risk factors for BE, such as gender and age, do not appear to be important determinants for endoscopic referral. Further evaluation of UE as a mechanism to increase screening for BE in primary care patients is merited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16427926     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endotherapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma.

Authors:  Drew B Schembre
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video).

Authors:  Anne F Peery; Toshitaka Hoppo; Katherine S Garman; Evan S Dellon; Norma Daugherty; Susan Bream; Alejandro F Sanz; Jon Davison; Melissa Spacek; Diane Connors; Ashley L Faulx; Amitabh Chak; James D Luketich; Nicholas J Shaheen; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic!

Authors:  Clare Parker; Estratios Alexandridis; John Plevris; James O'Hara; Simon Panter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-02

4.  Development of a program to train physician extenders to perform transnasal esophagoscopy and screen for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Bronia Alashkar; Ashley L Faulx; Ashley Hepner; Richard Pulice; Srikrishna Vemana; Katarina B Greer; Gerard A Isenberg; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Can endosheath technology open primary care doors to Barrett's esophagus screening by transnasal endoscopy?

Authors:  Prasad G Iyer; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Comparative quality assessment of esophageal examination with transnasal and sedated endoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas R Crews; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Michele L Johnson; Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-05

7.  GERD-related health care utilization, therapy, and reasons for transfer of GERD patients between primary care providers and gastroenterologists in a US managed care setting.

Authors:  Rachel Halpern; Smita Kothari; Mahesh Fuldeore; Victoria Zarotsky; Victoria Porter; Omar Dabbous; Jay L Goldstein
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.