Literature DB >> 16427925

Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and an international survey of ASGE members.

Tony E Yusuf1, Todd H Baron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic pseudocysts can be drained endoscopically via the transpapillary or the transmural routes. We sought to assess endoscopic methods of pseudocyst drainage.
METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) members in the United States (U.S.) and internationally.
RESULTS: Of the 3054 endoscopists to whom the survey was sent, 266 (8.7%) replied; 198 performed pseudocyst drainage (103 [52%] ASGE members from the United States and 95 [48%] international members). The median of the total number of drainages per physician was 15 (range 1-364). The transgastric route was the most commonly used drainage route (65%). Transmural entry was performed by using a needle-knife in 53% of transmural drainages that were not EUS-guided. The number of stents placed ranged from 1 to 5 and these remained in place for 2 to 30 weeks. CT scan was used before drainage by 95% of all respondents. EUS imaging was used before drainage by 72 of 103 (70%) US endoscopists compared with 56 of 95 (59%) international endoscopists (p = 0.1). EUS-guided drainage was used by 56% of US endoscopists compared with 43% international endoscopists (p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: The most common site of transmural entry for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts appears to be the transgastric route. Although CT is the most commonly used predrainage imaging modality, EUS is used before and during transmural drainage of pseudocysts in both the U.S. and abroad, particularly in academic medical centers. Use of EUS before or during drainage does not appear to be significantly different among endoscopists in the United States and internationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16427925     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  30 in total

1.  EUS-guided drainage is more successful in pancreatic pseudocysts compared with abscesses.

Authors:  Riadh Sadik; Evangelos Kalaitzakis; Anders Thune; Jan Hansen; Claes Jönson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Electronic resources preferred by pediatric hospitalists for clinical care.

Authors:  Jimmy B Beck; Joel S Tieder
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-10

Review 3.  Therapeutic role of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreaticobiliary disease: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Fan-Sheng Meng; Zhao-Hong Zhang; Feng Ji
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Endoscopic transmural drainage of pseudocysts associated with pancreatic resections or pancreatitis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Alvise Cavallini; Giovanni Butturini; Giuseppe Malleo; Francesca Bertuzzo; Gianpaolo Angelini; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Paolo Pederzoli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Difficult biliary access for ERCP.

Authors:  John Baillie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: Assessment of the procedure, technical details and review of the literature.

Authors:  Rajesh Puri; Ragesh Babu Thandassery; Abdulrahman A Alfadda; Saad Al Kaabi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

7.  The practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in gastroenterology: discrepancies between EBM familiarity and EBM competency.

Authors:  Jonathan Buscaglia; Satish Nagula; Jay Yuan; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Atul Kumar; Chris E Forsmark; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; John Stevenson; Brendan Day; Sherrill L Sellers; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 9.  Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement for inflammatory pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Pier-Alberto Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  EUS-guided transmural drainage for peripancreatic fluid collections using fine needle and stiff fine guidewire without electrocautery: An optional safe technique.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Miyatani; Yukio Yoshida
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.