Literature DB >> 16427641

The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse.

A Ayhan1, S Esin, S Guven, C Salman, O Ozyuncu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, complications, and satisfaction scores of patients who underwent the Manchester operation.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study evaluated data from 204 women who underwent the Manchester operation at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, from January 1985 to April 2004.
RESULTS: Mean age was 34.68+/-4.24 years and parity 2.47+/-0.96; 85.8% of the patients were premenopausal; 176 patients (86.28%) had grade 3 and 28 (13.72%) had grade 2 uterine prolapse; 95.1% of the patients had associated cystoceles and 51.3% had associated rectoceles; and 81.4% had urinary incontinence. Regarding early postoperative complications, 27 patients (13.23%) had febrile morbidity; retroperitoneal hematoma occurred in 1 patient (0.49%); urinary retention occurred in 45 patients (22.05%), and cervical stenosis occurred in 23 patients (11.27%). At 1 year, 1 patient had undergone abdominal hysterectomy because of unsuccessful cervical dilatation; and a mean of 3.6 years following the operation, 8 patients (3.9%) had undergone the tension-free vaginal tape procedure plus a vaginal hysterectomy for recurrent stress urinary incontinence and uterine prolapse. The mean satisfaction/acceptance score for the operation was 8.52+/-2.13 (range, 2-10).
CONCLUSION: A high degree of acceptance/satisfaction and a low morbidity rate show the Manchester operation to be a good option for the treatment of uterine prolapse in women who wish to keep their uterus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16427641     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  10 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 2.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent.

Authors:  Susanne D Thys; Anne- Lotte Coolen; Ingrid R Martens; Herman P Oosterbaan; Jan- Paul W R Roovers; Ben- Willem Mol; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The Manchester procedure: anatomical, subjective and sexual outcomes.

Authors:  Sissel Hegdahl Oversand; Anne C Staff; Ellen Borstad; Rune Svenningsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Alessandro Zucchi; Massimo Lazzeri; Massimo Porena; Luigi Mearini; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication.

Authors:  Tiny A de Boer; Alfredo L Milani; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mariella I J Withagen; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-08-11

Review 9.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).

Authors:  Sascha F M Schulten; Rosa A Enklaar; Kirsten B Kluivers; Sanne A L van Leijsen; Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Eddy M M Adang; Jeroen van Bavel; Heleen van Dongen; Maaike B E Gerritse; Iris van Gestel; G G Alec Malmberg; Ronald J C Mouw; Deliana A van Rumpt-van de Geest; Wilbert A Spaans; Annemarie van der Steen; Jelle Stekelenburg; E Stella M Tiersma; Anneke C Verkleij-Hagoort; Astrid Vollebregt; Chantal B M Wingen; Mirjam Weemhoff; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.809

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.