BACKGROUND: This article attempts to assess the effect of the duty-hour limitations implemented in 2003 on voluntary withdrawal of general surgery residents. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire asked the program directors how many categorical general surgery residents left voluntarily in 2003 to 2004, their training levels, why they left, and where they went. Results were compared with an identical study of 2000 to 2001 and analyzed statistically using chi-square analysis. RESULTS: A total of 215 programs (85%) responded, compared with 206 programs (81%) in the previous study. One hundred two programs (48%) reported voluntary attrition of 148 residents, compared with 110 programs (53%) and 167 residents previously. An average of 1.5 residents per program left in programs that reported attrition and 0.7 residents per program in all responders, compared with 1.5 and 0.8 residents in the previous study. In both studies, most programs with attrition lost one (66% [2000 to 2001] and 65% [2003 to 2004]) or two residents (21% [2000 to 2001] and 27% [2003 to 2004]). Most attrition occurred at PGY1 (47%) and PGY2 (28%) levels; a total of 75% of all attrition occurred at these levels, compared with a total of 76% in the previous study. One hundred eleven residents (75%) entered other medical specialties, and 23 (16%) transferred to other general surgery programs, compared with 105 residents (63%) and 40 residents (24%) in the previous study. In both studies, personal issues and work hours/lifestyle were cited as the most common reasons for leaving. In each study, the net loss to general surgery (the number of residents who left voluntarily divided by the total resident population at risk) was 3% for that academic year. Analysis showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Rates and patterns of attrition seem to have been unaffected by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hours limitations.
BACKGROUND: This article attempts to assess the effect of the duty-hour limitations implemented in 2003 on voluntary withdrawal of general surgery residents. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire asked the program directors how many categorical general surgery residents left voluntarily in 2003 to 2004, their training levels, why they left, and where they went. Results were compared with an identical study of 2000 to 2001 and analyzed statistically using chi-square analysis. RESULTS: A total of 215 programs (85%) responded, compared with 206 programs (81%) in the previous study. One hundred two programs (48%) reported voluntary attrition of 148 residents, compared with 110 programs (53%) and 167 residents previously. An average of 1.5 residents per program left in programs that reported attrition and 0.7 residents per program in all responders, compared with 1.5 and 0.8 residents in the previous study. In both studies, most programs with attrition lost one (66% [2000 to 2001] and 65% [2003 to 2004]) or two residents (21% [2000 to 2001] and 27% [2003 to 2004]). Most attrition occurred at PGY1 (47%) and PGY2 (28%) levels; a total of 75% of all attrition occurred at these levels, compared with a total of 76% in the previous study. One hundred eleven residents (75%) entered other medical specialties, and 23 (16%) transferred to other general surgery programs, compared with 105 residents (63%) and 40 residents (24%) in the previous study. In both studies, personal issues and work hours/lifestyle were cited as the most common reasons for leaving. In each study, the net loss to general surgery (the number of residents who left voluntarily divided by the total resident population at risk) was 3% for that academic year. Analysis showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Rates and patterns of attrition seem to have been unaffected by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hours limitations.
Authors: Ryan J Ellis; Amy L Holmstrom; D Brock Hewitt; Kathryn E Engelhardt; Anthony D Yang; Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; Yue-Yung Hu Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Jonathan S Abelson; Julie A Sosa; Matthew M Symer; Jialin Mao; Fabrizio Michelassi; Richard Bell; Art Sedrakyan; Heather L Yeo Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Alexander C Schwed; Steven L Lee; Edgardo S Salcedo; Mark E Reeves; Kenji Inaba; Richard A Sidwell; Farin Amersi; Chandrakanth Are; Tracey D Arnell; Richard B Damewood; Daniel L Dent; Timothy Donahue; Jeffrey Gauvin; Thomas Hartranft; Garth R Jacobsen; Benjamin T Jarman; Marc L Melcher; John D Mellinger; Jon B Morris; Mark Nehler; Brian R Smith; Mary Wolfe; Amy H Kaji; Christian de Virgilio Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Ho Seok Seo; Yong Hwa Eom; Min Ki Kim; Young-Min Kim; Byung Joo Song; Kyo Young Song Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Luis Carlos Dominguez; Laurents Stassen; Willem de Grave; Alvaro Sanabria; Edgar Alfonso; Diana Dolmans Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jacqueline Bustraan; Kirsten Dijkhuizen; Sophie Velthuis; Rachel van der Post; Erik Driessen; Jan M M van Lith; Arnout Jan de Beaufort Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 2.692