Literature DB >> 16427550

Objective comparison of complications resulting from laparoscopic bariatric procedures.

Manish S Parikh1, Scott Laker, Matt Weiner, Omid Hajiseyedjavadi, Christine J Ren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several surgical treatment options for morbid obesity exist. Currently, there are no studies that objectively compare complication rates after laparoscopic bariatric operations performed at a single institution. We objectively classify and compare complications resulting from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LABG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) with duodenal switch (DS). STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospective database of all patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric operation was performed. Complications were categorized according to severity score using a well-described classification system and compared between procedures.
RESULTS: From September 2000 to July 2003, 780 laparoscopic bariatric operations were performed: 480 LAGB, 235 RYGB, and 65 BPD+/-DS. There was one late death. Total complication rates were: 9% for LAGB, 23% for RYGB, and 25% for BPD+/-DS. Complications resulting in organ resection, irreversible deficits, and death (grades III and IV) occurred at rates of 0.2% for LAGB, 2% for RYGB, and 5% for BPD+/-DS. LAGB group had a statistically significant lower overall complication rate, both by incidence and severity, as compared with other groups (p < 0.001). After controlling for differences of admission body mass index, gender, and race, the LAGB group had an almost three and a half times lower likelihood of a complication compared with the RYGB group (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.2-5.3, p < 0.001) and had an over three and a half times lower likelihood of a complication compared with the BPD with DS group (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.1, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between complication rates of RYGB and BPD+/-DS.
CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric operation complication rates range from 9% to 25%; very few complications are serious. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is the safest operation in terms of complication rate and severity when compared with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic malabsorptive operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16427550     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  39 in total

1.  Distal esophageal erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with nissen fundoplication takedown.

Authors:  Gintaras Antanavicius; Daniel Leslie; Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos; Rafael Andrade; Todd Kellogg; Bridget Slusarek; Sayeed Ikramuddin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Liver abscess as a complication of laparoscopic gastric banding bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Danon Garrido; Larry M Bush
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  Revisional versus primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Tarik Delko; Thomas Köstler; Miroslav Peev; Adrian Esterman; Daniel Oertli; Urs Zingg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Twenty years of experience with bariatric surgery in a general hospital].

Authors:  D Gärtner; M Guhl; K Münz; A Hornung; J Hinderer; G Kieninger; U Hesse
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Diagnostic medical radiation dose in patients after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Tamara N Oei; Paul B Shyn; Usha Govindarajulu; Richard Flint
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data.

Authors:  Robert T Lancaster; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Efficacy of a laparoscopic gastric restrictive device in an obese canine model.

Authors:  Xiaomei Guo; Samer G Mattar; Scott E Mimms; Jose A Navia; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Outcome and complications after laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 5-year results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Markus Naef; Ursula Naef; Wolfgang G Mouton; Hans E Wagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LAGB) in moderately obese patients with and without co-morbidities.

Authors:  Luigi Angrisani; Pier Paolo Cutolo; Giampaolo Formisano; Gabriella Nosso; Antonella Santonicola; Giuliana Vitolo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.