Literature DB >> 16427323

Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.

Shirley-Ann Rüschemeyer1, Stefan Zysset, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

The processing of syntactic and semantic information in written sentences by native (L1) and non-native (L2) speakers was investigated in an fMRI experiment. This was done by means of a violation paradigm, in which participants read sentences containing either a syntactic, a semantic, or no violation. The results of this study were compared to those of a previous fMRI study, in which auditory sentence processing in L1 and L2 was investigated. The results indicate greater activation for L2 speakers as compared to L1 speakers when reading sentences in several language- and motor-related brain regions. The processing of syntactically incorrect sentences elicited no reliably greater activation in language areas in L2 speakers. In L1 speakers, on the other hand, syntactic processing, as compared to semantic processing, was associated with increased activation in left mid to posterior superior temporal gyrus. In response to the processing of semantically incorrect sentences, both L2 and L1 speakers demonstrated increased involvement of left inferior frontal gyrus. The results of this study were compared to a previously conducted fMRI study, which made use of identical sentence stimuli in the auditory modality. Results from the two studies are in general agreement with one another, although some differences in the response of brain areas very proximal to primary perceptual processing areas (i.e. primary auditory and visual cortex) were observed in conjunction with presentation in the different modalities. The combined results provide evidence that L1 and L2 speakers rely on the same cortical network to process language, although with a higher level of activation in some regions for L2 processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16427323     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  An approach to separating the levels of hierarchical structure building in language and mathematics.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Jörg Bahlmann; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Changes in neural activity associated with learning to articulate novel auditory pseudowords by covert repetition.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Abbie Pringle; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Native and Non-native Speakers' Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps.

Authors:  Anna Jessen; Julia Festman; Oliver Boxell; Claudia Felser
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

4.  Effects of sex and proficiency in second language processing as revealed by a large-scale fNIRS study of school-aged children.

Authors:  Lisa Sugiura; Shiro Ojima; Hiroko Matsuba-Kurita; Ippeita Dan; Daisuke Tsuzuki; Takusige Katura; Hiroko Hagiwara
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing.

Authors:  Eric Pakulak; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Similarities and Differences Between Native and Non-native Speakers' Processing of Formulaic Sequences: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.

Authors:  Licui Zhao; Daichi Yasunaga; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-04

7.  A shared neural substrate for mentalizing and the affective component of sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Hervé; Annick Razafimandimby; Gaël Jobard; Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-12

9.  Decoding speech perception by native and non-native speakers using single-trial electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Alex Brandmeyer; Jason D R Farquhar; James M McQueen; Peter W M Desain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Learning language with the wrong neural scaffolding: the cost of neural commitment to sounds.

Authors:  Amy S Finn; Carla L Hudson Kam; Marc Ettlinger; Jason Vytlacil; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.