INTRODUCTION: D-dimer is a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin. We hypothesized that hemorrhagic pleural effusions would have greater D-dimer levels than non-hemorrhagic pleural effusions, and that persistently bloody effusions would be distinguishable from thoracentesis-induced bloody effusions by the D-dimer level. METHODS: Forty pleural effusions were studied. D-dimer levels (measured by ELISA), red blood cell (RBC) count, white blood cell (WBC) count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and protein level was measured for each effusion. Ten effusions, five non-bloody, and five bloody were studied for each of the following disease states: parapneumonic effusion, congestive heart failure, post-coronary artery bypass grafting, and lung cancer. RESULTS: No significant difference of the D-dimer level was noted between bloody and non-bloody effusions of different disease states (P=0.286). There was no significant difference in the median D-dimer levels between all the bloody and all the non-bloody effusions (P=0.88). There was no significant difference (P=0.51) in D-dimer levels between five diseases groups when the bloody and non-bloody fluids were combined. The D-dimer levels did not correlate with the RBC count (r=0.11, P=0.48), WBC count (r=0.13, P=0.53), LDH (r=0.01, P=0.93), or protein levels (r=-0.01, P=0.93) in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Measurement of pleural fluid D-dimer levels does not distinguish persistently bloody effusions from non-bloody effusions, and does not aid in narrowing the differential diagnosis of an effusion.
INTRODUCTION: D-dimer is a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin. We hypothesized that hemorrhagic pleural effusions would have greater D-dimer levels than non-hemorrhagic pleural effusions, and that persistently bloody effusions would be distinguishable from thoracentesis-induced bloody effusions by the D-dimer level. METHODS: Forty pleural effusions were studied. D-dimer levels (measured by ELISA), red blood cell (RBC) count, white blood cell (WBC) count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and protein level was measured for each effusion. Ten effusions, five non-bloody, and five bloody were studied for each of the following disease states: parapneumonic effusion, congestive heart failure, post-coronary artery bypass grafting, and lung cancer. RESULTS: No significant difference of the D-dimer level was noted between bloody and non-bloody effusions of different disease states (P=0.286). There was no significant difference in the median D-dimer levels between all the bloody and all the non-bloody effusions (P=0.88). There was no significant difference (P=0.51) in D-dimer levels between five diseases groups when the bloody and non-bloody fluids were combined. The D-dimer levels did not correlate with the RBC count (r=0.11, P=0.48), WBC count (r=0.13, P=0.53), LDH (r=0.01, P=0.93), or protein levels (r=-0.01, P=0.93) in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Measurement of pleural fluid D-dimer levels does not distinguish persistently bloody effusions from non-bloody effusions, and does not aid in narrowing the differential diagnosis of an effusion.