Literature DB >> 16426615

Provision of individualised care improves hospital patient outcomes: an explanatory model using LISREL.

Riitta Suhonen1, Maritta Välimäki, Jouko Katajisto, Helena Leino-Kilpi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies propose the efficacy of individualised care for hospital patients. Individualised care and proposed correlates have not been tested by means of a single multivariate analyses simultaneously.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to examine predicted relationships between individualised care and patient satisfaction, patient autonomy and health-related quality of life.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional correlational survey. SETTINGS: This study was carried out in six acute hospitals in Southern Finland. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 861 (response rate 84%) pre-discharged hospitalised adult patients were recruited from surgical, gynaecological and internal medicine units.
METHODS: A correlational survey design was used to investigate to complete a battery of instruments measuring individualised care (the ICS), patient satisfaction with nursing care (the PSS), patient autonomy and perceived health-related quality of life (the 15D). The data from these instruments were used to test the proposed model using LISREL implementing the Maximum Likelihood estimation procedure.
RESULTS: The findings support the proposed model linking individualised nursing care directly to the positive patient outcomes defined. The initial model, permitting all possible covariances, showed a good fit between the variables. Independent variables, supported individuality through nursing interventions (ICS-A) and perception of individuality in their own care (ICS-B) accounted for 58% of the variance in the frequency of individualised care. Individualised care explained the variance on the dependent variables patient satisfaction and patient autonomy. A low but significant association was also found between individualised care and perceived health-related quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the contribution of individualised nursing care to positive patient outcomes, such as patient satisfaction, patient autonomy and perceived health-related quality of life. Not only clinically important, this model also has implications for further research into individualised care and its relationship with positive patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16426615     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  10 in total

1.  Ward features affecting stigma experiences in contemporary psychiatric hospitals: a multilevel study.

Authors:  Mieke Verhaeghe; Piet Bracke
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Patients' Point of View about Nurses' Support of Individualized Nursing Care in Training Hospitals Affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Alehe Seyyed Rasooli; Vahid Zamanzadeh; Azad Rahmani; Mahnaz Shahbazpoor
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 3.  Measuring patients' perceptions of patient-centered care: a systematic review of tools for family medicine.

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Martin Fortin; Jeannie L Haggerty; Mireille Lambert; Marie-Eve Poitras
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Patients' characteristics informing practice: improving individualized nursing care in the radiation oncology setting.

Authors:  Pauline M Rose
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Variations in sustained home visiting care for mothers and children experiencing adversity.

Authors:  Kie Kanda; Stacy Blythe; Rebekah Grace; Emma Elcombe; Lynn Kemp
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 1.770

6.  The German version of the Individualized Care Scale - assessing validity and reliability.

Authors:  Stefan Köberich; Riitta Suhonen; Johanna Feuchtinger; Erik Farin
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Development of a benchmarking toolkit for adolescent and young adult rheumatology services (BeTAR).

Authors:  Ran A Cai; Hema Chaplin; Polly Livermore; Martin Lee; Debajit Sen; Lucy R Wedderburn; Nick Wilkinson; Rachel Jeffery; Andrea Kempa; Imogen Norton; Rachel Tattersall; Yiannis Ioannou; Despina Eleftheriou
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.054

8.  Improving treatment outcomes for leprosy in Pernambuco, Brazil: a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of retreatment patients and their carers.

Authors:  Divya Khanna; Gilles de Wildt; Luiz Antonio Miranda de Souza Duarte Filho; Mitali Bajaj; Jo Freda Lai; Esme Gardiner; Andrea Maia Fernandes de Araújo Fonseca; Antje Lindenmeyer; Patrícia Sammarco Rosa
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Factors influencing hospitalized patients' perception of individualized nursing care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stefan Köberich; Johanna Feuchtinger; Erik Farin
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-03-01

10.  Shared decision making and experiences of patients with long-term conditions: has anything changed?

Authors:  Reem Kayyali; Shereen Nabhani Gebara; Iman Hesso; Gill Funnell; Minal Naik; Thuy Mason; Mohammed Ahsan Uddin; Noor Al-Yaseri; Umar Khayyam; Teebah Al-Haddad; Roshan Siva; John Chang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.