Barbara Lay1, Christoph Lauber, Carlos Nordt, Wulf Rössler. 1. Research Unit for Clinical and Social Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Militärstrasse 8, P.O. Box 1930, Zurich, Switzerland. barbara.lay@bli.unizh.ch
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Migration has become a major political and social concern in West European societies. METHODS: A case-control method was used to analyse the utilisation of inpatient mental health services by immigrants from a catchment area in Switzerland over a 7-year period. RESULTS: Compared to natives, immigrants had fewer psychiatric hospitalisations, but more emergency and compulsory admissions. During inpatient treatment, they received less psycho-, ergo- and physiotherapy. Other therapies as well as compulsory measures were at comparable rates, as was the frequency of irregular discharge. They spent shorter periods as inpatients and the rate of psychiatric readmissions was significantly lower. Comparison of different countries of origin revealed that only patients from West and North Europe were comparable to natives regarding type of referral, inpatient treatment, and longitudinal measures of service utilisation. Even after accounting for effects of social class, immigrants from South Europe, former Yugoslavia, Turkey, East Europe and more distant countries spent significantly shorter time in inpatient treatment, compared to Swiss control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study clearly point to an underutilisation of inpatient facilities among immigrants with mental disorders, and to disadvantages in psychiatric inpatient care. This, however, does not pertain to all foreign patients to the same extent: inequalities of mental health service use are particularly pronounced in immigrants from more distant countries.
BACKGROUND: Migration has become a major political and social concern in West European societies. METHODS: A case-control method was used to analyse the utilisation of inpatient mental health services by immigrants from a catchment area in Switzerland over a 7-year period. RESULTS: Compared to natives, immigrants had fewer psychiatric hospitalisations, but more emergency and compulsory admissions. During inpatient treatment, they received less psycho-, ergo- and physiotherapy. Other therapies as well as compulsory measures were at comparable rates, as was the frequency of irregular discharge. They spent shorter periods as inpatients and the rate of psychiatric readmissions was significantly lower. Comparison of different countries of origin revealed that only patients from West and North Europe were comparable to natives regarding type of referral, inpatient treatment, and longitudinal measures of service utilisation. Even after accounting for effects of social class, immigrants from South Europe, former Yugoslavia, Turkey, East Europe and more distant countries spent significantly shorter time in inpatient treatment, compared to Swiss control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study clearly point to an underutilisation of inpatient facilities among immigrants with mental disorders, and to disadvantages in psychiatric inpatient care. This, however, does not pertain to all foreign patients to the same extent: inequalities of mental health service use are particularly pronounced in immigrants from more distant countries.
Authors: Alicia Llácer; María Victoria Zunzunegui; Julia del Amo; Lucía Mazarrasa; Francisco Bolumar Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Natasja Koitzsch Jensen; Katrine Schepelern Johansen; Marianne Kastrup; Allan Krasnik; Marie Norredam Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jolanta Klukowska-Röetzler; Maria Eracleous; Martin Müller; David S Srivastava; Gert Krummrey; Osnat Keidar; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 3.390