Literature DB >> 16423446

Pre-treatment nomogram for disease-specific survival of patients with chemotherapy-naive androgen independent prostate cancer.

Robert Svatek1, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Michael Shulman, Jose Karam, Paul Perrotte, Elie Benaim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop a nomogram that predicts the probability of cancer-specific survival in men with untreated androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC).
METHODS: AIPC was diagnosed in 129 consecutive patients between 1989 and 2002. No patient received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to test the association between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at initiation of androgen deprivation, PSA doubling time (PSADT), PSA nadir on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), time from ADT to AIPC, and AIPC-specific mortality. Multivariate regression coefficients were then used to develop a nomogram predicting AIPC-specific survival at 12-60 mo after AIPC diagnosis. Two-hundred bootstrap resamples were used to internally validate the nomogram.
RESULTS: AIPC-specific mortality was recorded in 74 of 129 patients (57.4%). Other-cause mortality was recorded in 7 men (5.4%). Median overall survival was 52.0 mo (mean, 36.0 mo) and median AIPC-specific survival was 54.0 mo (mean, 35.0 mo). In univariate regression models, all variables were significant predictors of AIPC-specific survival (p < or = 0.02). In multivariate models, PSADT and time from androgen deprivation to AIPC remained statistically significant (p < or = 0.004). Bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 80.9% versus 74.9% for our previous model.
CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram predicting AIPC-specific survival is between 13% and 14% more accurate than previous nomograms and 6% more accurate than tree regression-based predictions obtained from the same data. Moreover, a nomogram approach combines several advantages, such as user-friendly interface and precise estimation of individual recurrence probability at several time points after AIPC diagnosis, which all patients deserve to know and all treating physicians need to know.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16423446     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  12 in total

1.  Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Cristiana Ragano Caracciolo; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano; Antonio Orlacchio; Roberta Danieli; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Role of nomograms for prostate cancer in 2007.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Uroncor consensus statement: Management of biochemical recurrence after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer: From biochemical failure to castration resistance.

Authors:  José López Torrecilla; Asunción Hervás; Almudena Zapatero; Antonio Gómez Caamaño; Victor Macías; Ismael Herruzo; Xavier Maldonado; Alfonso Gómez Iturriaga; Francesc Casas; Carmen González San Segundo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-05-30

4.  Surgical Decompression of High-Grade Spinal Cord Compression from Hormone Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Omar Chohan; Sweena Kahn; Gustav Cederquist; Anne S Reiner; Joseph Schwab; Ilya Laufer; Mark Bilsky
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Chronic pulmonary disease negatively influences the prognosis of patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  PET/CT with (18)F-choline after radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA ≤2 ng/ml. Can PSA velocity and PSA doubling time help in patient selection?

Authors:  Agostino Chiaravalloti; Daniele Di Biagio; Mario Tavolozza; Ferdinando Calabria; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Advanced imaging for the early diagnosis of local recurrence prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Flavio Barchetti; Daniela Musio; Francesca De Felice; Camilla Proietti; Elena Lucia Indino; Valentina Megna; Orazio Schillaci; Carlo Catalano; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Local prostate cancer radiotherapy after prostate-specific antigen progression during primary hormonal therapy.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Marc D Piroth; Richard Holy; Victoria Djukic; Jens Klotz; David Pfister; Axel Heidenreich; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Very-high-risk localized prostate cancer: definition and outcomes.

Authors:  D Sundi; V M Wang; P M Pierorazio; M Han; T J Bivalacqua; M W Ball; E S Antonarakis; A W Partin; E M Schaeffer; A E Ross
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.