Literature DB >> 16423418

The effect of sample size in studies of soil microbial community structure.

Sanghoon Kang1, Aaron L Mills.   

Abstract

Replicate soil samples of 0.01, 0.1, 0.25, 1.0 and 10.0 g were taken from a single, large, homogenized sample from a field maintained as continuous meadow. The samples were processed for direct enumeration of bacterial cells and community structure assays by DGGE analysis of PCR-amplified 16S-rDNA fragments from whole community extracts. The goal was to determine the sample size or size range that produced the most consistent results (i.e., mean values) and the lowest variance. Enumeration data were analyzed by ANOVA, and the community composition fingerprints were analyzed by discriminant analysis (DA). Acceptable results were obtained for sample sizes from 0.1 to 1.0 g for both enumeration and community fingerprinting, but the size that yielded the best results for both measures was 0.25 g. The results suggest that for well homogenized silt loam soils with moderate organic matter concentrations, this sample size should produce high quality consistent results. For soils that differ in organic concentrations or clay content, a reconnaissance survey similar to the present examination is recommended.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16423418     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  8 in total

1.  Quantification of extraradical soil mycelium and ectomycorrhizas of Boletus edulis in a Scots pine forest with variable sporocarp productivity.

Authors:  Herminia De la Varga; Beatriz Agueda; Fernando Martínez-Peña; Javier Parladé; Joan Pera
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Negative effects of sample pooling on PCR-based estimates of soil microbial richness and community structure.

Authors:  Daniel K Manter; Tiffany L Weir; Jorge M Vivanco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Impacts of Sampling Design on Estimates of Microbial Community Diversity and Composition in Agricultural Soils.

Authors:  Sarah C Castle; Deborah A Samac; Michael J Sadowsky; Carl J Rosen; Jessica L M Gutknecht; Linda L Kinkel
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Uneven distribution of Halobacillus trueperi species in arid natural saline systems of Southern Tunisian Sahara.

Authors:  Amel Guesmi; Besma Ettoumi; Darine El Hidri; Jihene Essanaa; Hanene Cherif; Francesca Mapelli; Ramona Marasco; Eleonora Rolli; Abdellatif Boudabous; Ameur Cherif
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Reexamining Sample Size Requirements for Multivariate, Abundance-Based Community Research: When Resources are Limited, the Research Does Not Have to Be.

Authors:  Frank L Forcino; Lindsey R Leighton; Pamela Twerdy; James F Cahill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effect of soil sample size, for practical DNA extraction, on soil microbial diversity in different taxonomic ranks.

Authors:  Hiroki Morita; Satoshi Akao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Size Matters: Assessing Optimum Soil Sample Size for Fungal and Bacterial Community Structure Analyses Using High Throughput Sequencing of rRNA Gene Amplicons.

Authors:  C Ryan Penton; Vadakattu V S R Gupta; Julian Yu; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Sample size effects on the assessment of eukaryotic diversity and community structure in aquatic sediments using high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Francisco J A Nascimento; Delphine Lallias; Holly M Bik; Simon Creer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.