Literature DB >> 1642315

Positional behavior and body size of arboreal primates: a theoretical framework for field studies and an illustration of its application.

J G Cant1.   

Abstract

The rationale for most field studies of the positional behavior of arboreal primates has been the need to document natural behaviors quantitatively in order to infer the functional significance of morphological configurations. This focus on interactions of morphology with behavior is justifiable, but there exists another important level of biological relationships, that of the animal with its structural habitat, which it must negotiate to find food and avoid being preyed on. Recently it has become apparent that body size is likely to affect relationships of positional behavior with habitat structure, as well as with morphology. Here I offer a framework for research on functional relationships of positional behavior, body size, and habitat structure, with the ultimate objective of elucidating the aptive significance of the great diversity exhibited by arboreal primates. This approach specifies several distinct problems that animals solve, and indicates how research might be directed at revealing the relative effectiveness with which different primates solve them. A preliminary application of the framework examines sympatric north Sumatran primates.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1642315     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330880302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  15 in total

1.  Ontogeny of positional behavior and support use among Colobus angolensis palliatus of the Diani Forest, Kenya.

Authors:  Noah Thomas Dunham
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Comparative and familial analysis of handedness in great apes.

Authors:  William D Hopkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  A review of trabecular bone functional adaptation: what have we learned from trabecular analyses in extant hominoids and what can we apply to fossils?

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Morphological analysis of the hindlimb in apes and humans. I. Muscle architecture.

Authors:  R C Payne; R H Crompton; K Isler; R Savage; E E Vereecke; M M Günther; S K S Thorpe; K D'Août
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Comparative assessment of handedness for a coordinated bimanual task in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Tara S Stoinski; Kristen E Lukas; Stephen R Ross; Michael J Wesley
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Sex differences in habitat use, positional behavior, and gaits of Golden Snub-Nosed Monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains, Shaanxi, China.

Authors:  Dionisios Youlatos; Michael C Granatosky; Roula Al Belbeisi; Gang He; Songtao Guo; Baoguo Li
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Orangutans employ unique strategies to control branch flexibility.

Authors:  Susannah K S Thorpe; Roger Holder; Robin H Crompton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Why are there apes? Evidence for the co-evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology.

Authors:  Kevin D Hunt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Terrestriality and tree stratum use in a group of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys.

Authors:  Yiming Li
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 1.781

10.  Factors affecting the compliance and sway properties of tree branches used by the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii).

Authors:  Adam van Casteren; William I Sellers; Susannah K S Thorpe; Sam Coward; Robin H Crompton; A Roland Ennos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.