Literature DB >> 16422843

A multinational population survey of intravaginal ejaculation latency time.

Marcel D Waldinger1, Paul Quinn, Maria Dilleen, Rajiv Mundayat, Dave H Schweitzer, Mitradev Boolell.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), defined as the time between the start of vaginal intromission and the start of intravaginal ejaculation, is increasingly used in clinical trials to assess the amount of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced ejaculation delay in men with premature ejaculation. Prospectively, stopwatch assessment of IELTs has superior accuracy compared with retrospective questionnaire and spontaneous reported latency. However, the IELT distribution in the general male population has not been previously assessed. AIM: To determine the stopwatch assessed-IELT distribution in large random male cohorts of different countries.
METHODS: A total of 500 couples were recruited from five countries: the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Spain, Turkey, and the United States. Enrolled men were aged 18 years or older, had a stable heterosexual relationship for at least 6 months, with regular sexual intercourse. The surveyed population were not included or excluded by their ejaculatory status and comorbidities. This survey was performed on a "normal" general population. Sexual events and stopwatch-timed IELTs during a 4-week period were recorded, as well as circumcision status and condom use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The IELT, circumcision status, and condom use.
RESULTS: The distribution of the IELT in all the five countries was positively skewed, with a median IELT of 5.4 minutes (range, 0.55-44.1 minutes). The median IELT decreased significantly with age, from 6.5 minutes in the 18-30 years group, to 4.3 minutes in the group older than 51 years (P<0.0001). The median IELT varied between countries, with the median value for Turkey being the lowest, i.e., 3.7 minutes (0.9-30.4 minutes), which was significantly different from each of the other countries. Comparison of circumcised (N=98) and not-circumcised (N=261) men in countries excluding Turkey resulted in median IELT values of 6.7 minutes (0.7-44.1 minutes) in circumcised compared with 6.0 minutes (0.5-37.4 minutes) in not-circumcised men (not significant). The median IELT value was not affected by condom use.
CONCLUSION: The IELT distribution is positively skewed. The overall median value was 5.4 minutes but with differences between countries. For all five countries, median IELT values were independent of condom usage. In countries excluding Turkey, the median IELT values were independent of circumcision status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16422843     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00070.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  73 in total

Review 1.  Advances in understanding and treating premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Theodore R Saitz; Ege Can Serefoglu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Lifelong premature ejaculation: definition, serotonergic neurotransmission and drug treatment.

Authors:  Marcel D Waldinger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Premature ejaculation: definition and drug treatment.

Authors:  Marcel D Waldinger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Does circumcision have a relationship with ejaculation time? Premature ejaculation evaluated using new diagnostic tools.

Authors:  B F Alp; S Uguz; E Malkoc; F Ates; F Dursun; S Okcelik; H Kocoglu; A K Karademir
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Mounir Lahyani; Tarik Karmouni; Khalid Elkhader; Abdellatif Koutani; Ahmed Ibn Attya Andaloussi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Study of the link between dopamine transporter gene polymorphisms and response to paroxetin and escitalopram in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation.

Authors:  T K Eltonsi; T M Tawfik; L A Rashed; S F GamalEl Din; M A Mahmoud
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Somatosensory evoked potentials assess the efficacy of circumcision for premature ejaculation.

Authors:  J-D Xia; H-S Jiang; L-L Zhu; Z Zhang; H Chen; Y-T Dai
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 8.  New insights on premature ejaculation: a review of definition, classification, prevalence and treatment.

Authors:  Ege C Serefoglu; Theodore R Saitz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Recent advances in the treatment of premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Kate D Linton; Kevan R Wylie
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Chris G McMahon
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.