Literature DB >> 16422713

Discursive practices in the documentation of patient assessments.

Kate Irving1, Margaret Treacy, Annie Scott, Abbey Hyde, Michelle Butler, Padraig MacNeela.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper reports a study analysing the various functions of nurses' documentation of patient assessments.
BACKGROUND: Modes of documentation have received much attention in the nursing press since the integration of the nursing process and nursing models. Previous research has shown that current documentation practices do not consistently promote effective communication and evaluation of patient care. A recent systematic review found no evidence that any particular system of documentation improved this situation. However, nurses' documentation serves not only to communicate information to others, but also has a political function as a presentation of what is important and ethically 'right' to report.
METHOD: A Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis was used to analyse 45 patient records.
FINDINGS: The findings indicate that nurses employ three discernible discursive practices in the documentation of patient assessments: medical, nursing and informal. Each practice has an effect on the presentation of nursing in the documentation. Because of the complex interplay between these practices, nurses present themselves as aligned with the medical profession, as distinct and professional, and as informal in their descriptions of non-biological information. The use of these practices appears to be motivated by the type of information being reporting.
CONCLUSION: Existing literature highlights the functional aspects of nursing documentation. In contrast, this paper explores the way in which nurses, through their documentation, constitute themselves and the nursing profession. In this way, nursing documentation is viewed as a social practice and a conduit through which particular power effects are produced and reproduced, rather than simply a matter of, for example, knowledge, individual choice or good practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16422713     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03710.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  4 in total

1.  A usability framework for speech recognition technologies in clinical handover: a pre-implementation study.

Authors:  Linda Dawson; Maree Johnson; Hanna Suominen; Jim Basilakis; Paula Sanchez; Dominique Estival; Barbara Kelly; Leif Hanlen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Health assets in nursing documentation of cancer care.

Authors:  Ann Kristin Rotegård; May Solveig Fagermoen; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

3.  Development and Testing of the interRAI Acute Care: A Standardized Assessment Administered by Nurses for Patients Admitted to Acute Care.

Authors:  Leonard C Gray; Elizabeth Beattie; Veronique M Boscart; Amanda Henderson; Yvonne C Hornby-Turner; Ruth E Hubbard; Susan Wood; Nancye M Peel
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2018-12-17

4.  What are dually diagnosed patients' problems represented to be in mental health? A WPR analysis of the multistability purpose of digital health records.

Authors:  Jeppe Oute; Bagga Bjerge; Larry Davidson
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2022-08-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.