Literature DB >> 16422392

Cancer biology and hormesis: human tumor cell lines commonly display hormetic (biphasic) dose responses.

Edward J Calabrese1.   

Abstract

This article assesses the nature of the dose-response relationship of human tumor cell lines with a wide range of agents including antineoplastics, toxic substances (i.e., environmental pollutants), nonneoplastic drugs, endogenous agonists, and phyto-compounds. Hormetic-like biphasic dose responses were commonly reported and demonstrated in 136 tumor cell lines from over 30 tissue types for over 120 different agents. Quantitative features of these hormetic dose responses were similar, regardless of tumor cell line or agent tested. That is, the magnitude of the responses was generally modest, with maximum stimulatory responses typically not greater than twice the control, while the width of the stimulatory concentration range was usually less than 100-fold. Particular attention was directed to possible molecular mechanisms of the biphasic nature of the dose response, as well as clinical implications in which a low concentration of chemotherapeutic agent may stimulate tumor cell proliferation. Finally, these findings further support the conclusion that hormetic dose responses are broadly generalizable, being independent of biological model, endpoint measured, and stressor agent, and represent a basic feature of biological responsiveness to chemical and physical stressors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16422392     DOI: 10.1080/10408440591034502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  60 in total

1.  Culturable endophytes of medicinal plants and the genetic basis for their bioactivity.

Authors:  Kristin I Miller; Chen Qing; Daniel Man-Yuen Sze; Basil D Roufogalis; Brett A Neilan
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Clinically relevant doses of chemotherapy agents reversibly block formation of glioblastoma neurospheres.

Authors:  Alicia M Mihaliak; Candace A Gilbert; Li Li; Marie-Claire Daou; Richard P Moser; Andrew Reeves; Brent H Cochran; Alonzo H Ross
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  Hormesis defined.

Authors:  Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 10.895

4.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Hormesis [biological effects of low level exposures (BELLE)] and dermatology.

Authors:  Haw-Yueh Thong; Howard I Maibach
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  The occurrence of hormesis in plants and algae.

Authors:  Nina Cedergreen; Jens C Streibig; Per Kudsk; Solvejg K Mathiassen; Stephen O Duke
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Viewpoint: mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of neurohormetic phytochemicals.

Authors:  Mark P Mattson; Tae Gen Son; Simonetta Camandola
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Changing the Risk Paradigms Can be Good for Our Health: J-Shaped, Linear and Threshold Dose-Response Models.

Authors:  P F Ricci; S R Straja; A L Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  The hormetic morphogen theory of curvature and the morphogenesis and pathology of tubular and other curved structures.

Authors:  Egil Fosslien
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  Hormesis and medicine.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.