Guang Yong Zou1, Allan Donner, Neil Klar. 1. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. gzou@robarts.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cluster randomization trials in which intact social units are randomly assigned to different intervention groups have become very popular in recent years, particularly for the evaluation of innovations in the delivery of health care. An extensive literature dealing with the associated methodological challenges has also appeared. Although the monitoring of such trials using formal stopping rules is clearly indicated when the outcomes are irreversible and individual-level data are available sequentially, simple and reliable statistical methods that may be used for this purpose are currently not available. PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of standard group sequential methods when applied to cluster randomization trials having binary outcomes. METHODS: The large sample distributions for each of five test statistics computed from sequentially accumulated data are derived. A simulation study is performed to evaluate the finite sample properties of these statistics when applied to the interim analysis of cluster randomization trials. Data from the World Health Organization antenatal care trial are used to illustrate the methods. RESULTS: Each of the joint distributions is shown to be characterized by a covariance structure that asymptotically satisfies an independent increments structure, a foundation that simplifies group sequential methods. The simulation study reveals that four of the five test statistics evaluated provide satisfactory performance with as few as 10 clusters allocated to each of two interventions. LIMITATIONS: The applicability of our results to effect estimation following a group sequential cluster randomization trial is not investigated, although a theoretical foundation which may be used for this purpose is presented. CONCLUSIONS: Standard group sequential methods can be applied to cluster randomization trials when interim analyses are warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Cluster randomization trials in which intact social units are randomly assigned to different intervention groups have become very popular in recent years, particularly for the evaluation of innovations in the delivery of health care. An extensive literature dealing with the associated methodological challenges has also appeared. Although the monitoring of such trials using formal stopping rules is clearly indicated when the outcomes are irreversible and individual-level data are available sequentially, simple and reliable statistical methods that may be used for this purpose are currently not available. PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of standard group sequential methods when applied to cluster randomization trials having binary outcomes. METHODS: The large sample distributions for each of five test statistics computed from sequentially accumulated data are derived. A simulation study is performed to evaluate the finite sample properties of these statistics when applied to the interim analysis of cluster randomization trials. Data from the World Health Organization antenatal care trial are used to illustrate the methods. RESULTS: Each of the joint distributions is shown to be characterized by a covariance structure that asymptotically satisfies an independent increments structure, a foundation that simplifies group sequential methods. The simulation study reveals that four of the five test statistics evaluated provide satisfactory performance with as few as 10 clusters allocated to each of two interventions. LIMITATIONS: The applicability of our results to effect estimation following a group sequential cluster randomization trial is not investigated, although a theoretical foundation which may be used for this purpose is presented. CONCLUSIONS: Standard group sequential methods can be applied to cluster randomization trials when interim analyses are warranted.
Authors: Marie-Claude Boily; Benoît Mâsse; Ramzi Alsallaq; Nancy S Padian; Jeffrey W Eaton; Juan F Vesga; Timothy B Hallett Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Esther de Hoop; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Rieke van der Graaf; Karel G M Moons; Johannes J M van Delden; Johannes B Reitsma; Hendrik Koffijberg Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Karla Hemming; Monica Taljaard; Joanne E McKenzie; Richard Hooper; Andrew Copas; Jennifer A Thompson; Mary Dixon-Woods; Adrian Aldcroft; Adelaide Doussau; Michael Grayling; Caroline Kristunas; Cory E Goldstein; Marion K Campbell; Alan Girling; Sandra Eldridge; Mike J Campbell; Richard J Lilford; Charles Weijer; Andrew B Forbes; Jeremy M Grimshaw Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-11-09