Literature DB >> 1642141

Relationship between bone mass and rates of bone change at appendicular measurement sites.

J W Davis1, J S Grove, P D Ross, J M Vogel, R D Wasnich.   

Abstract

The rate of bone change among postmenopausal women may vary depending upon the initial bone mass. Examining this possibility is difficult, however, because of a negative statistical bias that occurs when change is regressed against the initial value of the same variable. In this article, four statistical methods were applied to measure the association between bone mass and the rate of bone change. The study population was Japanese-American women, who were monitored for approximately 5 years. Bone changes were determined for the calcaneus and the distal and proximal radius. The results were consistent across the bone sites but differed between statistical methods. Three of the four methods indicated that the women with the greater bone mass had the greater loss rates. The fourth method did not support this association. Possible reasons for the discordant results are discussed. Using the "best" estimate of the relationship, a gradual convergence of bone mass was projected over time toward the population mean. The convergence occurred because women with higher bone mass had a somewhat faster loss rate than women with lower bone mass. Overall, however, the variation in bone mass between individuals was large compared to the rate of convergence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1642141     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

1.  Correlation of transmenopausal bone mass in healthy white women: a long-term longitudinal study.

Authors:  L-J Zhao; P-Y Liu; R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  On genetic studies of bone loss.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Hui Shen; Hui Jiang; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Variability of vertebral and femoral postmenopausal bone loss: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  J M Pouillès; F Trémollières; C Ribot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Can biochemical markers predict bone loss at the hip and spine?: a 4-year prospective study of 141 early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R W Keen; T Nguyen; R Sobnack; L A Perry; P W Thompson; T D Spector
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The independent and combined effects of intensive weight loss and exercise training on bone mineral density in overweight and obese older adults with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D P Beavers; K M Beavers; R F Loeser; N R Walton; M F Lyles; B J Nicklas; S A Shapses; J J Newman; S P Messier
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  When should bone density measurements be repeated?

Authors:  Y F He; P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Peak trabecular bone microstructure predicts rate of estrogen-deficiency-induced bone loss in rats.

Authors:  Yihan Li; Wei-Ju Tseng; Chantal M J de Bakker; Hongbo Zhao; Rebecca Chung; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.