Literature DB >> 16421175

Clinical predictors and prognostic significance of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

François Brigadeau1, Claude Kouakam, Didier Klug, Christelle Marquié, Alain Duhamel, Frédérique Mizon-Gérard, Dominique Lacroix, Salem Kacet.   

Abstract

AIMS: Insufficient data exists regarding predictors of electrical storms (ES) and clinical outcome in patients treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The purpose of this study was to delineate a subgroup of patients likely to experience ES and to determine the impact of ES on mortality in ICD recipients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of 307 ICD-treated patients were retrospectively analysed. ES was defined as two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 h leading to an immediate electrical therapy (antitachycardia pacing and/or shock), separated by a period of sinus rhythm. Clinical characteristics and survival of 123 patients experiencing a total of 294 episodes of ES (median 2 ES/patient, range 1-9), were compared with those of 184 ES-free patients during a median follow-up of 826 days (inter-quartile 1141 days). Median actuarial duration for the first ES occurrence after ICD implant was 1417 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 1061-2363] with a median follow-up of 816 days (7-4642 days) in ES-free patients. Univariate analysis identified older age, depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ventricular tachycardia (VT) as index arrhythmia, chronic renal failure and absence of lipid-lowering drugs as variables significantly associated with an increased risk of ES. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed an independent predictive value for chronic renal failure [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, 95% CI 0.95-2.51, P=0.052], VT (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.44-3.37, P=0.0003), and LVEF (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, P=0.027). In contrast, diabetics (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.90, P=0.022) were less affected by ES. There was no difference in survival between both groups.
CONCLUSION: ES is frequent but does not increase mortality in ICD's recipients. Patients with severe systolic dysfunction, chronic renal failure and VT as initial arrhythmia are likely to experience ES. Diabetics are less affected by ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16421175     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  22 in total

Review 1.  The evaluation and management of electrical storm.

Authors:  Michael Eifling; Mehdi Razavi; Ali Massumi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Electrical storm in patients with an implanted defibrillator: a matter of definition.

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; S Serge Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  [Electrical storm: definition, prevalence, causes and prognostic implications].

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; Johannes C Manegold
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-01

4.  [Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm: methods and outcome].

Authors:  Erik Wißner; Bruno Reißmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-05

Review 5.  Electrical Storm: Incidence, Prognosis and Therapy.

Authors:  Antonio Sagone
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  VT ablation in heart failure.

Authors:  D Bänsch; R Schneider; I Akin; C A Nienaber
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  Arrhythmic Recurrence and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With First Episode of Electrical Storm.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Damonte; Marco Giuseppe Del Buono; Georgia K Thomas; James Mbualungu; Bennett Clark; Rocco Antonio Montone; Daniel H Berrocal; Tamas S Gal; Le Kang; Juan Lu; Benjamin Van Tassell; Jayanthi Koneru; Thomas C Crawford; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Antonio Abbate; Jordana Kron
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 8.  Electrical storm: A clinical and electrophysiological overview.

Authors:  Sergio Conti; Salvatore Pala; Viviana Biagioli; Giuseppe Del Giorno; Martina Zucchetti; Eleonora Russo; Vittoria Marino; Antonio Dello Russo; Michela Casella; Francesca Pizzamiglio; Valentina Catto; Claudio Tondo; Corrado Carbucicchio
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

9.  Long-time "real-life" performance of the subcutaneous ICD in patients with electrical heart disease or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerrit Frommeyer; Dirk G Dechering; Simon Kochhäuser; Markus Bettin; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt; Florian Reinke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Electrical storm: Incidence, Prognosis and Therapy.

Authors:  Riccardo Proietti; Antonio Sagone
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2011-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.