OBJECTIVES: To explore the extent to which commonly used measures of specific outcomes in dementia are an appropriate proxy for quality of life in dementia. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study set in communities in London and Nottingham, comprising 101 people with dementia and their 99 main family caregivers. The main outcome measures were health related quality of life in dementia (measured by the DEMQOL-Proxy), cognition (Mini Mental State Examination), functional impairment (Barthel Index), behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia (Neuropsychiatric Inventory; NPI), and carer mental health (General Health Questionnaire). RESULTS: On univariate analysis, decreased quality of life was statistically significantly correlated with higher levels of behavioural and psychological disturbance (NPI total score and its agitation, depression, anxiety, disinhibition, and irritability subscales); younger age of the person with dementia; and poorer mental health of the carer. Quality of life was not statistically significantly associated with cognition or carer age. In a multivariate model, psychological and behavioural disturbance and patient age remained statistically significantly associated with quality of life. Carer mental health was no longer statistically significantly associated, and cognition and functional limitation remained statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that quality of life in dementia is complex, and that simple proxy substitutions of discrete measures such as cognition or function are likely to miss important factors.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the extent to which commonly used measures of specific outcomes in dementia are an appropriate proxy for quality of life in dementia. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study set in communities in London and Nottingham, comprising 101 people with dementia and their 99 main family caregivers. The main outcome measures were health related quality of life in dementia (measured by the DEMQOL-Proxy), cognition (Mini Mental State Examination), functional impairment (Barthel Index), behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia (Neuropsychiatric Inventory; NPI), and carer mental health (General Health Questionnaire). RESULTS: On univariate analysis, decreased quality of life was statistically significantly correlated with higher levels of behavioural and psychological disturbance (NPI total score and its agitation, depression, anxiety, disinhibition, and irritability subscales); younger age of the person with dementia; and poorer mental health of the carer. Quality of life was not statistically significantly associated with cognition or carer age. In a multivariate model, psychological and behavioural disturbance and patient age remained statistically significantly associated with quality of life. Carer mental health was no longer statistically significantly associated, and cognition and functional limitation remained statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that quality of life in dementia is complex, and that simple proxy substitutions of discrete measures such as cognition or function are likely to miss important factors.
Authors: S C Smith; D L Lamping; S Banerjee; R Harwood; B Foley; P Smith; J C Cook; J Murray; M Prince; E Levin; A Mann; M Knapp Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: A Hofman; W A Rocca; C Brayne; M M Breteler; M Clarke; B Cooper; J R Copeland; J F Dartigues; A da Silva Droux; O Hagnell Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Gary Naglie; David B Hogan; Murray Krahn; Sandra E Black; B Lynn Beattie; Christopher Patterson; Chris Macknight; Morris Freedman; Michael Borrie; Anna Byszewski; Howard Bergman; David Streiner; Jane Irvine; Paul Ritvo; Janna Comrie; Matthew Kowgier; George Tomlinson Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: In-Soo Lee; Wayne Bardwell; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Loki Natarajan; Jose S Loredo; Joel E Dimsdale Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Carol E Franz; Judith C Barker; Kathleen Kim; Yvette Flores; Cecily Jenkins; Richard L Kravitz; Ladson Hinton Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Betty S Black; Deirdre Johnston; Ann Morrison; Peter V Rabins; Constantine G Lyketsos; Quincy M Samus Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sebastian E Sattui; Mangala Rajan; Sarah B Lieber; Geyanne Lui; Madeline Sterling; Jeffrey R Curtis; Lisa A Mandl; Iris Navarro-Millán Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Christine Rake; Clare Gilham; Laurette Bukasa; Richard Ostler; Michelle Newton; James Peto Wild; Benoit Aigret; Michael Hill; Oliver Gillie; Irwin Nazareth; Peter Sasieni; Adrian Martineau; Julian Peto Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Richard Schulz; Kathleen A McGinnis; Song Zhang; Lynn M Martire; Randy S Hebert; Scott R Beach; Bozena Zdaniuk; Sara J Czaja; Steven H Belle Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2008 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703