Literature DB >> 16419963

Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on maturation of regenerate bone in a rabbit limb lengthening model.

Kenneth F Taylor1, Nozumu Inoue, Bahman Rafiee, John E Tis, Kathleen A McHale, Edmund Y S Chao.   

Abstract

To study the effect of applying pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) during the consolidation phase of limb lengthening, a mid-tibial osteotomy was performed in 18 adult New Zealand White rabbits and an external fixator was applied anteromedially. Animals were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. After a 7-day latency period, the tibiae were distracted 0.5 mm every 12 h for 10 days. The treatment group received a 20-day course of PEMF for 60 min daily, coinciding with initiation of the consolidation phase. The control group received sham PEMF. Radiographs were performed weekly after distraction. Animals were euthanized 3 weeks after the end of distraction. Radiographic analysis revealed no significant difference in regenerate callus area between treatment and control tibiae immediately after distraction, at 1 week, 2 weeks, or 3 weeks after distraction ( p = 0.71, 0.22, 0.44, and 0.50, respectively). There was also no significant difference in percent callus mineralization ( p = 0.96, 0.69, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to structural stiffness ( p = 0.80) or maximal torque to failure ( p = 0.62). However, there was a significant positive difference in mineral apposition rate between groups during the interval 1-2 weeks post-distraction ( p < 0.05). This difference was no longer evident by the interval 2-3 weeks post-distraction. While PEMF applied during the consolidation phase of limb lengthening did not appear to have a positive effect on bone regenerate, it increased osteoblastic activity in the cortical bone adjacent to the distraction site. Since the same PEMF signal was reported to be beneficial in the rabbit distraction osteogenesis when applied during distraction phase and consolidation phase, application of PEMF in the early phase may be more effective. Further work is necessary to determine optimal timing of the PEMF stimulation during distraction osteogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16419963     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  9 in total

1.  Clinical significance of different effects of static and pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoclast cultures.

Authors:  Simona Angela Barnaba; Laura Ruzzini; Alberto Di Martino; Angela Lanotte; Alessandro Sgambato; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shortens the treatment time in tibial distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Khaled Hamed Salem; Andreas Schmelz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Overview of Physical and Pharmacological Therapy in Enhancing Bone Regeneration Formation During Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Ze Liu; Qi Liu; Hongbin Guo; Jieyu Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-04-28

4.  Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation in human osteoprogenitor cells by pulsed electromagnetic fields: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Justus H W Jansen; Olav P van der Jagt; Bas J Punt; Jan A N Verhaar; Johannes P T M van Leeuwen; Harrie Weinans; Holger Jahr
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  A novel single pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone repair.

Authors:  Yin-Chih Fu; Chih-Chun Lin; Je-Ken Chang; Chung-Hwan Chen; I-Chun Tai; Gwo-Jaw Wang; Mei-Ling Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Enhancement of bone consolidation using high-frequency pulsed electromagnetic short-waves and titanium implants coated with biomimetic composite embedded into PLA matrix: in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Daniel Oltean-Dan; Gabriela-Bombonica Dogaru; Maria Tomoaia-Cotisel; Dragos Apostu; Alexandru Mester; Horea-Rares-Ciprian Benea; Mihai-Gheorghe Paiusan; Elena-Mihaela Jianu; Aurora Mocanu; Reka Balint; Catalin-Ovidiu Popa; Cristian Berce; Gyorgy-Istvan Bodizs; Alina-Mihaela Toader; Gheorghe Tomoaia
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-07-25

7.  Magnetic responsive hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds construction for bone defect reparation.

Authors:  Xiao Bo Zeng; Hao Hu; Li Qin Xie; Fang Lan; Wen Jiang; Yao Wu; Zhong Wei Gu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-07-04

8.  Regenerate bone stimulation following limb lengthening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julio J Jauregui; Anthony V Ventimiglia; Preston W Grieco; David B Frumberg; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  The Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields to Promote Bone Responses to Biomaterials In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carlo Galli; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte; Stefano Guizzardi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2018-09-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.