Literature DB >> 16418926

Linking on-farm dairy management practices to storm-flow fecal coliform loading for California coastal watersheds.

D J Lewis1, E R Atwill, M S Lennox, L Hou, B Karle, K W Tate.   

Abstract

How and where to improve water quality within an agricultural watershed requires data at a spatial scale that corresponds with individual management decision units on an agricultural operation. This is particularly true in the context of water quality regulations, such as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), that identify agriculture as one source of non-point source pollution through larger tributary watershed scale and above and below water quality investigations. We have conducted a systems approach study of 10 coastal dairies and ranches to document fecal coliform concentration and loading to surface waters at the management decision unit scale. Water quality samples were collected on a storm event basis from loading units that included: manure management systems; gutters; storm drains; pastures; and corrals and lots. In addition, in-stream samples were collected above and below the dairy facilities and from a control watershed, managed for light grazing and without a dairy facility or human residence and corresponding septic system. Samples were analyzed for fecal coliform concentration by membrane filtration. Instantaneous discharge was measured for each collected sample. Storm runoff was also calculated using the curve number method (SCS, 1985). Results for a representative dairy as well as the entire 10 dairy data set are presented. Fecal coliform concentrations demonstrate high variability both within and between loading units. Fecal coliform concentrations for pastures range from 206 to 2,288,888 cfu/100 ml and for lots from 1,933 to 166,105,000 cfu/100 ml. Mean concentrations for pastures and lots are 121,298 (SE = 62,222) and 3,155,584 (SE = 1,902,713) cfu/100 ml, respectively. Fecal coliform load from units of concentrated animals and manure are significantly more than units such as pastures while storm flow amounts were significantly less. Compared with results from earlier tributary scale studies in the watershed, this systems approach has generated water quality data that is beneficial for management decisions because of its scale and representation of current management activities. These results are facilitating on-farm changes through the cooperative efforts of dairy managers, regulatory agency staff, and sources of technical and financial assistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16418926     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-3911-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci.

Authors:  C Hagedorn; S L Robinson; J R Filtz; S M Grubbs; T A Angier; R B Reneau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of F+ RNA and DNA coliphages as source-specific indicators of fecal contamination in surface waters.

Authors:  Dana Cole; Sharon C Long; Mark D Sobsey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Cryptosporidia on dairy farms and the role these farms may have in contaminating surface water supplies in the northeastern United States.

Authors:  W M Sischo; E R Atwill; L E Lanyon; J George
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  Studies of Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. in two adjacent watersheds.

Authors:  C Ong; W Moorehead; A Ross; J Isaac-Renton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Prevalence of Escherichia coli serogroups and human virulence factors in faeces of urban Canada geese (Branta canadensis).

Authors:  Heather Kullas; Matt Coles; Jack Rhyan; Larry Clark
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Restructuring of the Aquatic Bacterial Community by Hydric Dynamics Associated with Superstorm Sandy.

Authors:  Nikea Ulrich; Abigail Rosenberger; Colin Brislawn; Justin Wright; Collin Kessler; David Toole; Caroline Solomon; Steven Strutt; Erin McClure; Regina Lamendella
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Composition and design of vegetative filter strips instrumental in improving water quality by mass reduction of suspended sediment, nutrients and Escherichia coli in overland flows in eastern escarpment of Mau Forest, Njoro River Watershed, Kenya.

Authors:  C O Olilo; J O Onyando; W N Moturi; A W Muia; Amber F Roegner; Z Ogari; P N Ombui; W A Shivoga
Journal:  Energy Ecol Environ       Date:  2016-06-13

3.  Humans and Hoofed Livestock Are the Main Sources of Fecal Contamination of Rivers Used for Crop Irrigation: A Microbial Source Tracking Approach.

Authors:  Constanza Díaz-Gavidia; Carla Barría; Daniel L Weller; Marilia Salgado-Caxito; Erika M Estrada; Aníbal Araya; Leonardo Vera; Woutrina Smith; Minji Kim; Andrea I Moreno-Switt; Jorge Olivares-Pacheco; Aiko D Adell
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Climate and on-farm risk factors associated with Giardia duodenalis cysts in storm runoff from California coastal dairies.

Authors:  Woutrina A Miller; David J Lewis; Michael Lennox; Maria G C Pereira; Kenneth W Tate; Patricia A Conrad; Edward R Atwill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Antibiotic-resistant E. coli in surface water and groundwater in dairy operations in Northern California.

Authors:  Xunde Li; Naoko Watanabe; Chengling Xiao; Thomas Harter; Brenda McCowan; Yingjia Liu; Edward R Atwill
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Causal connections between water quality and land use in a rural tropical island watershed: rural tropical island watershed analysis.

Authors:  Guy Ragosta; Carl Evensen; E R Atwill; Mark Walker; Tamara Ticktin; Adam Asquith; Kenneth W Tate
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  Risk factors for infection with pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant fecal bacteria in northern elephant seals in California.

Authors:  Robyn A Stoddard; Edward R Atwill; Frances M D Gulland; Melissa A Miller; Haydee A Dabritz; Dave M Paradies; Karen R Worcester; Spencer Jang; Judy Lawrence; Barbara A Byrne; Patricia A Conrad
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Microbial groundwater sampling protocol for fecal-rich environments.

Authors:  Thomas Harter; Naoko Watanabe; Xunde Li; Edward R Atwill; William Samuels
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.