Literature DB >> 16418785

Pretreatment levels of bone turnover and the antifracture efficacy of alendronate: the fracture intervention trial.

Douglas C Bauer1, Patrick Garnero, Marc C Hochberg, Art Santora, Pierre Delmas, Susan K Ewing, Dennis M Black.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The influence of pretreatment bone turnover on alendronate efficacy is not known. In the FIT, we examined the effect of pretreatment bone turnover on the antifracture efficacy of daily alendronate given to postmenopausal women. The nonspine fracture efficacy of alendronate was significantly greater among both osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic women with higher baseline levels of the bone formation marker PINP.
INTRODUCTION: Previous trials have shown that high bone turnover is associated with greater increases in BMD among bisphosphonate-treated women. The influence of pretreatment bone turnover levels on antifracture efficacy has not been well studied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized women 55-80 years of age with femoral neck BMD T scores < or = -1.6 to alendronate (ALN), 5-10 mg/day (n = 3105), or placebo (PBO; n = 3081). At baseline, 3495 women were osteoporotic (femoral neck BMD T score < or = -2.5 or prevalent vertebral fracture), and 2689 were not osteoporotic (BMD T score > -2.5 and no prevalent vertebral fracture). Pretreatment levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSALP), N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (PINP), and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (sCTx) were measured in all participants using archived serum (20% fasting). The risk of incident spine and nonspine fracture was compared in ALN- and PBO-treated subjects stratified into tertiles of baseline bone marker level. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: During a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, 492 nonspine and 294 morphometric vertebral fractures were documented. Compared with placebo, the reduction in nonspine fractures with ALN treatment differed significantly among those with low, intermediate, and high pretreatment levels of PINP levels (p = 0.03 for trend). For example, among osteoporotic women in the lowest tertile of pretreatment PINP (<41.6 ng/ml), the ALN versus PBO relative hazard for nonspine fracture was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.65, 1.21) compared with a relative hazard of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.74) among those in the highest tertile of PINP (>56.8 ng/ml). Results were similar among women without osteoporosis at baseline. Although they did not reach statistical significance, similar trends were observed with baseline levels of BSALP. Conversely, spine fracture treatment efficacy among osteoporotic women did not differ significantly according to pretreatment marker levels. Spine fracture treatment efficacy among nonosteoporotic women was related to baseline BSALP (p = 0.05 for trend). In summary, alendronate nonspine fracture efficacy is greater among both osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic women with high pretreatment PINP. If confirmed in other studies, these findings suggest that bisphosphonate treatment may be most effective in women with elevated bone turnover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16418785     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.051018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  55 in total

1.  Should bisphosphonates be used for long-term treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis?

Authors:  Steven L Teitelbaum; Margaret P Seton; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-02

2.  Successes achieved and challenges ahead in translating biomarkers into clinical applications.

Authors:  Greg Tesch; Shashi Amur; John T Schousboe; Jeffrey N Siegel; Lawrence J Lesko; Jane P F Bai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  The role of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis management in clinical practice.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; Paul Glendenning; Howard A Morris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-08

Review 4.  Unmet needs in fracture prevention: new European guidelines for the investigation and registration of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Bone markers in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical management of primary and secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; S A Paul Chubb
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Does a history of non-vertebral fracture identify women without osteoporosis for treatment?

Authors:  Kathryn M Ryder; Steven R Cummings; Lisa Palermo; Suzanne Satterfield; Douglas C Bauer; Adrianne C Feldstein; John T Schousboe; Ann V Schwartz; Kristine Ensrud
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Prediction of changes in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women treated with once-weekly bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Kenneth Saag; Anthony Sebba; Anne E de Papp; Erluo Chen; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Comparing non-vertebral fracture risk reduction with osteoporosis therapies: looking beneath the surface.

Authors:  A Sebba
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Evidence-based guidelines for the use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the selection and monitoring of bisphosphonate treatment in osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  P Bergmann; J-J Body; S Boonen; Y Boutsen; J-P Devogelaer; S Goemaere; J-M Kaufman; J-Y Reginster; V Gangji
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.