E M Evans1, D A Rowe, S B Racette, K M Ross, E McAuley. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, USA. elevans@uiuc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between body fatness (%Fat) and body mass index (BMI) and to evaluate the validity of the BMI standards for obesity established by the NIH in older black and white postmenopausal women. RESEARCH METHODS: Height, weight, BMI, and %Fat, assessed by DXA, were determined for 296 healthy, independently living women ranging in age from 50 to 80 years (M+/-s.d.; 64.4+/-7.8 years). RESULTS: Per NIH guidelines, 32% were classified as obese (> or = 30 kg/m2, mean BMI = 28.1+/-5.5 kg/m2). In contrast, using the %Fat criterion of 38% advocated by Lohman to define obesity, 47% of our sample was obese (mean %Fat=37.3+/-6.2%). A moderately high curvilinear relation existed between BMI and %Fat (R = 0.82, SEE = 3.57 %Fat, P<0.05). Race added meaningfully to the prediction of %Fat (P<0.05) such that for the same BMI, black women will have 1% lower body fatness than white women. Based on a %Fat > or = 38 as the criterion for obesity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, performed separately by race, indicated that the currently accepted BMI cutpoint for obesity produced low sensitivity (69% and 61% for black and white women, respectively). Alternatively, BMI values > or = 28.4 kg/m2 for black women and > or = 26.9 kg/m2 for white women to define obesity maximized classification accuracy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that current BMI categories may not be appropriate for identifying obesity among postmenopausal women. Furthermore, the relation between BMI and %Fat is different in black compared to white women but remains constant from the sixth through the eighth decade of life.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between body fatness (%Fat) and body mass index (BMI) and to evaluate the validity of the BMI standards for obesity established by the NIH in older black and white postmenopausal women. RESEARCH METHODS: Height, weight, BMI, and %Fat, assessed by DXA, were determined for 296 healthy, independently living women ranging in age from 50 to 80 years (M+/-s.d.; 64.4+/-7.8 years). RESULTS: Per NIH guidelines, 32% were classified as obese (> or = 30 kg/m2, mean BMI = 28.1+/-5.5 kg/m2). In contrast, using the %Fat criterion of 38% advocated by Lohman to define obesity, 47% of our sample was obese (mean %Fat=37.3+/-6.2%). A moderately high curvilinear relation existed between BMI and %Fat (R = 0.82, SEE = 3.57 %Fat, P<0.05). Race added meaningfully to the prediction of %Fat (P<0.05) such that for the same BMI, black women will have 1% lower body fatness than white women. Based on a %Fat > or = 38 as the criterion for obesity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, performed separately by race, indicated that the currently accepted BMI cutpoint for obesity produced low sensitivity (69% and 61% for black and white women, respectively). Alternatively, BMI values > or = 28.4 kg/m2 for black women and > or = 26.9 kg/m2 for white women to define obesity maximized classification accuracy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that current BMI categories may not be appropriate for identifying obesity among postmenopausal women. Furthermore, the relation between BMI and %Fat is different in black compared to white women but remains constant from the sixth through the eighth decade of life.
Authors: Petra B Schuler; Debra Vinci; Robert M Isosaari; Steven F Philipp; John Todorovich; Jane L P Roy; Retta R Evans Journal: J Cross Cult Gerontol Date: 2008-04-01
Authors: Sani M Roy; David A Fields; Jonathan A Mitchell; Colin P Hawkes; Andrea Kelly; Gary D Wu; Patricia A DeRusso; Michal A Elovitz; Eileen Ford; Danielle Drigo; Babette S Zemel; Shana E McCormack Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Maciej S Buchowski; Sarah S Cohen; Charles E Matthews; David G Schlundt; Lisa B Signorello; Margaret K Hargreaves; William J Blot Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: C-H Wu; S Heshka; J Wang; R N Pierson; S B Heymsfield; B Laferrère; Z Wang; J B Albu; X Pi-Sunyer; D Gallagher Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2007-04-24 Impact factor: 5.095