Literature DB >> 16417073

Management of histologic abnormalities of the cervix.

Mark Spitzer1, Barbara S Apgar, Gregory L Brotzman.   

Abstract

The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology sponsored a consensus conference in 2001 to develop evidence-based guidelines for women with histologic abnormalities of the cervix. The options for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1, 2, and 3 are ranked according to the strength of the recommendation and the quality of the evidence. Follow-up with repeat cytology at six and 12 months or DNA testing for high-risk types of human papillomavirus at 12 months is the preferred management approach for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 and satisfactory initial colposcopy. If results from repeat cytology are reported as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater, or if DNA human papillomavirus testing is positive for oncogenic types of the virus, repeat colposcopy is preferred. When the initial colposcopy is unsatisfactory, a diagnostic excisional procedure is preferred. Follow-up without treatment is acceptable only in women who are pregnant and adolescents with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 who had unsatisfactory colposcopy. Biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3 requires treatment except during pregnancy and in compliant adolescents with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and negative endocervical curettage. When colposcopy is satisfactory, treatment includes ablative or excisional procedures. A diagnostic excisional procedure is recommended in women with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 and unsatisfactory colposcopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16417073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  4 in total

1.  Increase in viral load, viral integration, and gain of telomerase genes during uterine cervical carcinogenesis can be simultaneously assessed by the HPV 16/18 MLPA-assay.

Authors:  Wendy Theelen; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Michael Herfs; Martin Reijans; Guus Simons; Els V Meulemans; Marcella M Baldewijns; Frans C S Ramaekers; Joan Somja; Philippe Delvenne; Anton H N Hopman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Treatment strategies in intermediate cervical neoplasia: Implications of radical surgery.

Authors:  K W M VAN Delft; H J M M Mertens
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Should LSIL with ASC-H (LSIL-H) in cervical smears be an independent category? A study on SurePath specimens with review of literature.

Authors:  Vinod B Shidham; Nidhi Kumar; Raj Narayan; Gregory L Brotzman
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  The effectiveness of conization treatment for post-menopausal women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Xiaodong Cheng; Yan Feng; Xinyu Wang; Xiaoyun Wan; Xing Xie; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.