Literature DB >> 16416441

Toward rapid high resolution in vivo intravascular MRI: evaluation of vessel wall conspicuity in a porcine model using multiple imaging protocols.

Claudia M Hillenbrand1, John A Jesberger, Eddy Y Wong, Shaoxiong Zhang, David T Chang, Frank K Wacker, Jonathan S Lewin, Jeffrey L Duerk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences for high resolution intravascular imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intravascular imaging of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries was performed in vivo in a porcine model at 1.5 T using catheter-mounted micro-receive coils. Ten protocols, including spin-echo (SE)-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI), segmented EPI, half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE), fast imaging with steady-state free precession (TrueFISP), turbo spin-echo (TSE), and SE acquisition schemes were employed in 13 trials. Images were analyzed by six expert raters with respect to wall-conspicuity, wall-to-lumen/tissue contrast, visible layers of the arterial wall, anticipated clinical usefulness, and overall image quality. Mean differences between sequence-types were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups with planned comparisons.
RESULTS: The vessel wall was delineated in almost all protocols. Motion artifacts from physiological and device motion were reduced in fast techniques. The best contrast between the wall and surrounding tissue was provided by a HASTE protocol. Anatomic layers of the vessel wall were best depicted on dark blood T2-weighted TSE. Overall, TrueFISP was ranked highest on the remaining measures.
CONCLUSION: Dedicated catheter-coils combined with fast sequences have potential for in vivo characterization of vessel walls. TrueFISP offered the best overall image quality and acquisition speed, but suffered from the inability to delineate the multiple layers of the wall, which seems associated with dark blood- and T2-weighted contrast. We believe future intra-arterial trials should proceed from this study in normal artery imaging and initially focus on fast T2-weighted dark blood techniques in trials with pathology. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16416441     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  7 in total

Review 1.  MRI of atherosclerosis: diagnosis and monitoring therapy.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Justin D Anderson
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2007-01

2.  Modeling Endovascular MRI Coil Coupling With Transmit RF Excitation.

Authors:  Madhav Venkateswaran; Orhan Unal; Samuel Hurley; Alexey Samsonov; Peng Wang; Sean B Fain; Krishna N Kurpad
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vascular interventions.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; Michael Guttman; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10

Review 4.  An overview on the advances in cardiovascular interventional MR imaging.

Authors:  Olaf Saborowski; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Halting the effects of flow enhancement with effective intermittent zeugmatographic encoding (HEFEWEIZEN) in SSFP.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Mark A Griswold; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  MR fluoroscopy in vascular and cardiac interventions (review).

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Steve W Hetts; Joey English; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  3D geometric reconstruction of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Alessandro Borghi; Nigel B Wood; Raad H Mohiaddin; X Yun Xu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.