Literature DB >> 16416220

Muscle shortening along the normal esophagus during swallowing.

Qing Dai1, Annapurna Korimilli, Vinod K Thangada, Chan Y Chung, Henry Parkman, James Brasseur, Larry S Miller.   

Abstract

Longitudinal shortening of the esophagus during peristaltic contraction has been previously analyzed globally using spaced mucosal clips. This method gives a relatively crude measurement. In this study, local longitudinal shortening (LLS) was evaluated using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal ultrasound (HREUS) and manometry based on basic principles of muscle mechanics. We sought to determine if there are regional differences in LLS of the esophageal muscle during swallow-induced peristaltic contraction and evaluate shortening of the circular smooth muscle (CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) of the esophagus. Twenty normal subjects underwent simultaneous HREUS/manometry at 4 levels (5, 10, 15, and 20 cm above the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter [LES] high-pressure zone) in the esophagus with 5-mL swallows of water. Ultrasound images were recorded with synchronized manometric pressure data. The images were digitized and the cross-sectional surface area (CSA) of the LSM, CSM, and total muscle (TM) were measured at baseline (at rest) and at peak intraluminal pressure (implying peak CSM contraction) during swallowing. LLS was calculated for the CSM and LSM using the principle of mass conservation, whereby the change in CSA relative to the resting CSA is quantitatively equal to the relative change in length of a local longitudinal muscle segment.CSM, LSM, and TM all shortened longitudinally, with the circular muscle shortening more than the longitudinal muscle, LLS of the CSM and TM layers at 5 cm above the LES was significantly greater than at 20 cm (CSM: 30% difference, P < .001; TM: 18% difference, P < .05). The greater shortening of LSM at 5 versus 20 cm was found not to be statistically significant (11% difference, P > .05). Peak intraluminal pressure strongly correlated with peak muscle thickness of all layers at all levels (r = 0.96-0.98).LLS increases from the proximal to the distal esophagus during bolus transport. CSM and LSM both shorten longitudinally, with CSM shortening more than LSM. The increase in LLS increases the efficiency of peristaltic contraction and likely contributes to the axial displacement of the LES preceding hiatal opening and esophageal emptying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16416220     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-3092-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  7 in total

1.  Local longitudinal muscle shortening of the human esophagus from high-frequency ultrasonography.

Authors:  M A Nicosia; J G Brasseur; J B Liu; L S Miller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.052

2.  The mechanical advantage of local longitudinal shortening on peristaltic transport.

Authors:  Anupam Pal; James G Brasseur
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Shortening of the esophagus in response to swallowing.

Authors:  S A Edmundowicz; R E Clouse
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-03

4.  Timing, propagation, coordination, and effect of esophageal shortening during peristalsis.

Authors:  P Pouderoux; S Lin; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Movement of the feline esophagus associated with respiration and peristalsis. An evaluation using tantalum markers.

Authors:  W J Dodds; E T Stewart; D Hodges; F F Zboralske
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  The phrenic ampulla: distal esophagus or potential hiatal hernia?

Authors:  S Lin; J G Brasseur; P Pouderoux; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-02

7.  Attenuation of esophageal shortening during peristalsis with hiatus hernia.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; S Wu; S Lin; P Pouderoux
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 22.682

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Function of longitudinal vs circular muscle fibers in esophageal peristalsis, deduced with mathematical modeling.

Authors:  James G Brasseur; Mark A Nicosia; Anupam Pal; Larry S Miller
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Circular and longitudinal muscles shortening indicates sliding patterns during peristalsis and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.

Authors:  Nirali Patel; Yanfen Jiang; Ravinder K Mittal; Tae Ho Kim; Melissa Ledgerwood; Valmik Bhargava
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Circular smooth muscle contributes to esophageal shortening during peristalsis.

Authors:  Anil K Vegesna; Keng-Yu Chuang; Ramashesai Besetty; Steven J Phillips; Alan S Braverman; Mary F Barbe; Michael R Ruggieri; Larry S Miller
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Esophageal function testing: beyond manometry and impedance.

Authors:  Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 5.  Safety and Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Shorter Myotomy versus Longer Myotomy for Patients with Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Xinyi Zeng; Shu Huang; Huifang Xia; Lei Shi; Jiao Jiang; Wensen Ren; Yan Peng; Muhan Lü; Xiaowei Tang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Axial Movements and Length Changes of the Human Lower Esophageal Sphincter During Respiration and Distension-induced Secondary Peristalsis Using Functional Luminal Imaging Probe.

Authors:  Donghua Liao; Christian Lottrup; Lotte Fynne; Barry P McMahon; Klaus Krogh; Asbjørn M Drewes; Jingbo Zhao; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.