Literature DB >> 16415903

Differential activation of G-proteins by mu-opioid receptor agonists.

Zuzana Saidak1, Katherine Blake-Palmer, Debbie L Hay, John K Northup, Michelle Glass.   

Abstract

We investigated the ability of the activated mu-opioid receptor (MOR) to differentiate between myristoylated G(alphai1) and G(alphaoA) type G(alpha) proteins, and the maximal activity of a range of synthetic and endogenous agonists to activate each G(alpha) protein. Membranes from HEK293 cells stably expressing transfected MOR were chaotrope extracted to denature endogenous G-proteins and reconstituted with specific purified G-proteins. The G(alpha) subunits were generated in bacteria and were demonstrated to be recognised equivalently to bovine brain purified G(alpha) protein by CB(1) cannabinoid receptors. The ability of agonists to catalyse the MOR-dependent GDP/[(35)S]GTP(gamma)S exchange was then compared for G(alphai1) and G(alphaoA). Activation of MOR by DAMGO produced a high-affinity saturable interaction for G(alphaoA) (K(m)=20+/-1 nM) but a low-affinity interaction with G(alphai1) (K(m)=116+/-12 nM). DAMGO, met-enkephalin and leucine-enkephalin displayed maximal G(alpha) activation among the agonists evaluated. Endomorphins 1 and 2, methadone and beta-endorphin activated both G(alpha) to more than 75% of the maximal response, whereas fentanyl partially activated both G-proteins. Buprenorphine and morphine demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the maximal activities between G(alphai1) and G(alphaoA). Interestingly, DAMGO, morphine, endomorphins 1 and 2, displayed significant differences in the potencies for the activation of the two G(alpha). Differences in maximal activity and potency, for G(alphai1) versus G(alphaoA), are both indicative of agonist selective activation of G-proteins in response to MOR activation. These findings may provide a starting point for the design of drugs that demonstrate greater selectivity between these two G-proteins and therefore produce a more limited range of effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16415903      PMCID: PMC1751342          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  52 in total

1.  G-protein coupling of mu-opioid receptors (OP3): elevated basal signalling activity.

Authors:  N T Burford; D Wang; W Sadée
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Palmitoylation of intracellular signaling proteins: regulation and function.

Authors:  Jessica E Smotrys; Maurine E Linder
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  G-protein mediated gating of inward-rectifier K+ channels.

Authors:  M D Mark; S Herlitze
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2000-10

4.  Mu and delta receptors belong to a family of receptors that are coupled to potassium channels.

Authors:  R A North; J T Williams; A Surprenant; M J Christie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Inverse agonists and neutral antagonists at mu opioid receptor (MOR): possible role of basal receptor signaling in narcotic dependence.

Authors:  D Wang; K M Raehal; E J Bilsky; W Sadée
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  Agonist selective regulation of G proteins by cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors.

Authors:  M Glass; J K Northup
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  The guanine nucleotide activating site of the regulatory component of adenylate cyclase. Identification by ligand binding.

Authors:  J K Northup; M D Smigel; A G Gilman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Buprenorphine in the treatment of opiate dependence: its pharmacology and social context of use in the U.S.

Authors:  Donald R Wesson
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2004-05

9.  Buprenorphine-induced antinociception is mediated by mu-opioid receptors and compromised by concomitant activation of opioid receptor-like receptors.

Authors:  Kabirullah Lutfy; Shoshana Eitan; Camron D Bryant; Yu C Yang; Nazli Saliminejad; Wendy Walwyn; Brigitte L Kieffer; Hiroshi Takeshima; F Ivy Carroll; Nigel T Maidment; Christopher J Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Transcriptional regulation of mu opioid receptor gene by cAMP pathway.

Authors:  Po-Wei Lee; Yu-May Lee
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  31 in total

1.  μ-opioid receptors: correlation of agonist efficacy for signalling with ability to activate internalization.

Authors:  Jamie McPherson; Guadalupe Rivero; Myma Baptist; Javier Llorente; Suleiman Al-Sabah; Cornelius Krasel; William L Dewey; Chris P Bailey; Elizabeth M Rosethorne; Steven J Charlton; Graeme Henderson; Eamonn Kelly
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Asymmetric conformational changes in a GPCR dimer controlled by G-proteins.

Authors:  Marjorie Damian; Aimée Martin; Danielle Mesnier; Jean-Philippe Pin; Jean-Louis Banères
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006.

Authors:  Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Agonist-dependent attenuation of mu-opioid receptor-mediated G-protein activation in the dorsal root ganglia of neuropathic rats.

Authors:  Ilona Obara; Ozge Gunduz Cinar; Katarzyna Starowicz; Sandor Benyhe; Anna Borsodi; Barbara Przewlocka
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Functional selectivity at the μ-opioid receptor: implications for understanding opioid analgesia and tolerance.

Authors:  Kirsten M Raehal; Cullen L Schmid; Chad E Groer; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 6.  Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS).

Authors:  A K Mangat; G M Schmölzer; W K Kraft
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Neuroprotective potential of CB1 receptor agonists in an in vitro model of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  E L Scotter; C E Goodfellow; E S Graham; M Dragunow; M Glass
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of the Third Generation 17-Cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6β-[(4'-pyridyl)carboxamido]morphinan (NAP) Derivatives as μ/κ Opioid Receptor Dual Selective Ligands.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Samuel Obeng; Huiqun Wang; Abdulmajeed M Jali; Bharath Peddibhotla; Dwight A Williams; Chuanchun Zou; David L Stevens; William L Dewey; Hamid I Akbarali; Dana E Selley; Yan Zhang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  The effect of protein kinase C and G protein-coupled receptor kinase inhibition on tolerance induced by mu-opioid agonists of different efficacy.

Authors:  L C Hull; J Llorente; B H Gabra; F L Smith; E Kelly; C Bailey; G Henderson; W L Dewey
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Discriminative stimulus functions of methanandamide and delta(9)-THC in rats: tests with aminoalkylindoles (WIN55,212-2 and AM678) and ethanol.

Authors:  Torbjörn U C Järbe; Chen Li; Subramanian K Vadivel; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.