Literature DB >> 16414528

Retinopathy of prematurity: an optimum screening strategy.

Shu Fen Ho1, M R K Mathew, W Wykes, T Lavy, T Marshall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to find out whether birth weight of less than 1251 g or gestational age less than 30 weeks could provide a safe and efficient screening criteria of detecting treatable retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
METHODS: Infants either with a birth weight less than 1500 g or gestational age less than 32 weeks were screened for ROP during an 8-year period.
RESULTS: In our study, the incidence of ROP was 36 of 187 (19.3%) infants. Although there was a slight increase in the number of infants screened over the years, the incidence of ROP of any stage remained stable. The maximum stage of ROP reached was stage 1 in 10 of 187 (5.3%), stage 2 in 8 of 187 (4.3%), and stage 3 in 18 of 187 (9.6%) infants. Among those with stage 3 disease, threshold ROP was present in 16 of 18 (88.9%). All infants with threshold ROP had a BW less than 1100 g and gestational age less than or equal to 28 weeks. Significantly fewer babies (105/187, or 56%) would have been examined had inclusion criteria of a birth weight of less than 1251 g and gestational age less than 30 weeks been applied. In addition, 31% (134/437) of screening examinations could have been avoided.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a birth weight of less than 1251 g and gestational age less than 30 weeks can be safely and efficiently used to screen infants without missing a diagnosis of sight-threatening ROP in our catchment population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16414528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  7 in total

1.  Retinopathy of prematurity: Recommendations for screening.

Authors:  Al Jefferies
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Neonatologists' practices and experiences in arranging retinopathy of prematurity screening services.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; David K Wallace
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Malpractice and the quality of care in retinopathy of prematurity (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  James D Reynolds
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

4.  Evaluation of modified retinopathy of prematurity screening guidelines using birth weight as the sole inclusion criterion.

Authors:  Kakarla V Chalam; Selina Lin; Ravi K Murthy; Vikram S Brar; Shailesh K Gupta; Ravi Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07

5.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Retinopathy of Prematurity in North of Iran.

Authors:  Yousef Alizadeh; Marjaneh Zarkesh; Reza Soltani Moghadam; Bahareh Esfandiarpour; Hassan Behboudi; Mohammad-Mehdi Karambin; Abtin Heidarzade
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Factors associated with retinopathy of prematurity ophthalmology workload.

Authors:  Jack Jacob; Zinnia Matrix; Debra Skopec; Benjamin Ticho; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Preclinical screening for retinopathy of prematurity risk using IGF1 levels at 3 weeks post-partum.

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Muñuzuri; Maria Luz Couce-Pico; Ana Baña-Souto; Olalla López-Suárez; Alicia Iglesias-Deus; José Blanco-Teijeiro; José Ramón Fernández-Lorenzo; José María Fraga-Bermúdez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.