Literature DB >> 16414495

Expectant treatment with curative intent in the prostate-specific antigen era: triggers for definitive therapy.

Christopher A Warlick1, Mohamad E Allaf, H Ballentine Carter.   

Abstract

Expectant treatment with curative intent for treatment of low-risk prostate cancer faces 3 challenges in the PSA era: (1) appropriate patient selection, (2) adequate surveillance strategies, and (3) identification of triggers for definitive intervention when cure is still possible. Men 65 years or older with T1c disease, prostate-specific antigen density <0.15 ng/ml/cm3, and favorable biopsy characteristics per the Epstein criteria currently appear to be the safest candidates for expectant treatment. Changes in biopsy characteristics are the most objective trigger for definitive therapy currently in use. Outcomes data are still required to determine the safety of expectant treatment for localized disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414495     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  7 in total

1.  Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment.

Authors:  Robert E Weiss; Vladimir Egorov; Suren Ayrapetyan; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Defining 'surveillance' in drug safety.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Manfred Hauben; Andrew Bate
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Treatment decision making in early-stage papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Elyse Shuk; Erin K Maloney; Rebecca Zeuren; R Michael Tuttle; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Residual prostate cancer after radiotherapy: a study of radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  David J Kaplan; Paul L Crispen; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Mark K Buyyounouski; Eric M Horwitz; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Natural history of pathologically organ-confined (pT2), Gleason score 6 or less, prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  David J Hernandez; Matthew E Nielsen; Misop Han; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Low risk prostate cancer in men under age 65: the case for definitive treatment.

Authors:  Thomas L Jang; Ofer Yossepowitch; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intent.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; M Craig Miller; Patricia Landis; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.