Literature DB >> 16414469

A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings of the acromioclavicular joint in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients.

Beth E Shubin Stein1, Christopher S Ahmad, Charles H Pfaff, Louis U Bigliani, William N Levine.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare acromioclavicular (AC) joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in asymptomatic patients with those in symptomatic patients. The MRI scans of 25 patients with symptomatic AC joints were compared with 50 asymptomatic control subjects by use of the same grading scale. In the symptomatic group, AC joint arthritis grading was normal in 0%, mild in 20%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 28%. In the asymptomatic group, grading was normal in 18%, mild in 66%, moderate in 12%, and severe in 4%; there was a statistically higher grade of AC arthritis in the symptomatic group (P < .05). Of the symptomatic individuals, 80% demonstrated reactive bone edema in either the distal clavicle (6), the acromion (3), or both sides of the AC joint (11), whereas no individual in the asymptomatic group had this finding (P < .05). Reactive bone edema on MRI is a more reliable predictor of symptomatic AC pathology than degenerative changes seen on MRI and, when correlated with clinical examination, is reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414469     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint arthritis in persons with spinal cord injury compared to able-bodied persons.

Authors:  Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Renate Engisch; Martin W G Brinkhof; Stefan van Drongelen
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

2.  An analysis of acromioclavicular joint morphology as a factor for shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Toby J Colegate-Stone; Adel Tavakkolizadeh; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-03-06

3.  [Systematics of glenohumoral and acromioclavicular arthritis].

Authors:  A Seifarth; F Roemer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Bony Edema and Clinical Examination Findings Predict the Need for Distal Clavicle Excision at the Time of Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Conor B Garry; Matthew H Adsit; Vaughn Land; Galen Sanderson; Sean G Sheppard; George C Balazs
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 5.  Complications of rotator cuff surgery-the role of post-operative imaging in patient care.

Authors:  R S Thakkar; S C Thakkar; U Srikumaran; E G McFarland; L M Fayad
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging scans are not a reliable tool for predicting symptomatic acromioclavicular arthritis.

Authors:  Bijayendra Singh; Abhinav Gulihar; Praveen Bilagi; Arpit Goyal; Pallavi Goyal; Rajesh Bawale; Dilip Pillai
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-08-17

7.  Shoulder disorders in an outpatient clinic: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli; Jorge Henrique Assunção; Gustavo de Mello Ribeiro Pinto; Arthur Zorzi Freire da Silveira; Arnaldo Amado Ferreira
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  A prospective study of shoulder pain in primary care: prevalence of imaged pathology and response to guided diagnostic blocks.

Authors:  Angela Cadogan; Mark Laslett; Wayne A Hing; Peter J McNair; Mark H Coates
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain.

Authors:  Angela Cadogan; Peter McNair; Mark Laslett; Wayne Hing
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Shoulder diagnoses in secondary care, a one year cohort.

Authors:  Niels G Juel; Bård Natvig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.