Literature DB >> 16414379

Abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair: correlation with chronic sac pressure measurement.

Sharif H Ellozy1, Alfio Carroccio, Robert A Lookstein, Tikva S Jacobs, Michael D Addis, Victoria J Teodorescu, Michael L Marin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered to be evidence of clinical success. Exclusion of the sac from systemic pressure is the likely cause of shrinkage. We report our continuing clinical experience with the use of a permanently implantable, ultrasound-activated remote pressure transducer to measure intrasac pressure and its correlation with changes in sac diameter over time.
METHODS: Over a 22-month period, 21 patients underwent EVAR of an infrarenal AAA with implantation of an ultrasound-activated remote pressure transducer fixed to the outside of the stent-graft and exposed to the excluded aortic sac. Intrasac pressures were measured directly with an intravascular catheter and by the remote sensor at the time of stent-graft deployment. Follow-up sac pressures were measured by remote sensor and compared with systemic arterial pressure at every follow-up visit. Mean follow-up was 11.4 +/- 5.0 months (range, 1 to 26 months). Twenty patients had follow-up of > or =6 months. Mean pressure index (MPI) was calculated as the ratio of mean sac pressure to mean systemic pressure.
RESULTS: Pressures could be obtained at all visits in 15 of the 21 patients. Fourteen of these 15 patients had follow-up of at least 6 months. Aneurysm sac shrinkage of >5 mm was seen in seven (50%) of these 14 patients. No aneurysm enlargement was observed in any patient. The MPI was significantly lower in patients with sac shrinkage at 6 months and at final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair results in marked reduction of sac pressure in most patients. Patients with aneurysm shrinkage after EVAR have significantly lower MPI; however, the absence of sac shrinkage does not imply persistent pressurization of the sac. Further clinical follow-up will delineate the role of long-term sac pressure monitoring in surveillance after EVAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414379     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Mid-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is it possible to predict sac shrinkage?

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ishibashi; Tsuneo Ishiguchi; Takashi Ohta; Ikuo Sugimoto; Hirohide Iwata; Tetsuya Yamada; Masao Tadakoshi; Noriyuki Hida; Yuki Orimoto; Seiji Kamei
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

3.  Clinical factors increasing radiation doses to patients undergoing long-lasting procedures: abdominal stent-graft implantation.

Authors:  Natalia Majewska; Michal G Stanisic; Magdalena Aleksandra Blaszak; Robert Juszkat; Maciej Frankiewicz; Zbigniew Krasinski; Marcin Makalowski; Waclaw Majewski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-11

4.  Delayed complication of iliac artery aneurysm repair-from critical limb ischemia to mixed shock: a case report.

Authors:  Maria Carla Cañizares Otero; Floyd Osterman; Mauricio Danckers
Journal:  AME Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Detecting endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair with a minimally invasive, implantable, telemetric pressure sensor: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Roland Schlierf; Joachim-Georg Pfeffer; Andreas H Mahnken; Uwe Schnakenberg; Thomas Schmitz-Rode
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Periostin links mechanical strain to inflammation in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Osamu Yamashita; Koichi Yoshimura; Ayako Nagasawa; Koshiro Ueda; Noriyasu Morikage; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Kimikazu Hamano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.