Literature DB >> 16414278

EEG reveals the effect of fMRI scanner noise on noise-sensitive subjects.

Juergen Pripfl1, Simon Robinson, Ulrich Leodolter, Ewald Moser, Herbert Bauer.   

Abstract

One drawback of fMRI is that subjects must endure intense noise during testing. This may be annoying to some people and acceptable to others. The aim of this study was to examine, by means of event-related potentials (ERPs), the possible influence of this noise on brain activity while performing a mental reasoning task. Subjects carrying out tasks in a silent environment were compared with two groups executing the same tasks in an "fMRI-like" noisy environment, one of which consisted of subjects who were annoyed by the noise and the other of subjects who tolerated it easily. Subjects who were annoyed performed less well (i.e., produced more errors compared to the "no noise" group) and "not annoyed" subjects showed a speed-accuracy trade-off (i.e., reacted faster but made more errors compared to "no noise" subjects). Noise led to more pronounced N1 and P2 peaks but attenuated N2. As early ERP components are influenced by attention, this observation most likely reflects different attentional requirements. The slow cortical negative shift during task processing was significantly attenuated with "annoyed" subjects compared to "not annoyed" subjects. Emotion-related subcortical structures may be responsible for the observed difference. These findings suggest that individual reactions to fMRI scanner noise should be taken into account when designing fMRI studies and interpreting results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414278     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd; David Welch; Kim N Dirks; Renata Mathews
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The impact of MRI scanner environment on perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Birte U Forstmann; Max C Keuken; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

Review 3.  Imaging Posture Veils Neural Signals.

Authors:  Robert T Thibault; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  A window into the brain mechanisms associated with noise sensitivity.

Authors:  Marina Kliuchko; Marja Heinonen-Guzejev; Peter Vuust; Mari Tervaniemi; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Misophonia is associated with altered brain activity in the auditory cortex and salience network.

Authors:  Arjan Schröder; Guido van Wingen; Nadine Eijsker; Renée San Giorgi; Nienke C Vulink; Collin Turbyne; Damiaan Denys
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Negative impact of noise and noise sensitivity on mental health in childhood.

Authors:  Jongseok Lim; Kukju Kweon; Hyo-Won Kim; Seung Woo Cho; Jangho Park; Chang Sun Sim
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Children's Effortful Control Skills, but Not Their Prosocial Skills, Relate to Their Reactions to Classroom Noise.

Authors:  Jessica Massonnié; Philippe Frasseto; Terry Ng-Knight; Katie Gilligan-Lee; Natasha Kirkham; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Frontal midline theta rhythm and gamma power changes during focused attention on mental calculation: an MEG beamformer analysis.

Authors:  Ryouhei Ishii; Leonides Canuet; Tsutomu Ishihara; Yasunori Aoki; Shunichiro Ikeda; Masahiro Hata; Themistoklis Katsimichas; Atsuko Gunji; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Takayuki Nakahachi; Masao Iwase; Masatoshi Takeda
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.