Literature DB >> 16413887

Analysis of muscle hardness in patients with masticatory myofascial pain.

Koji Kashima1, Kaori Igawa, Sho Maeda, Sumio Sakoda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to access any changes in the muscle hardness of the masseter muscle between normal subjects and patients with myofascial pain during brief sustained isometric contractions at various bite force levels, and to compare muscle hardness, especially in terms of the recovery phase, after a clenching task.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with masticatory myofascial pain and 10 age- and weight-matched normal healthy controls participated in this study. First, the hardness of the right masseter muscle was measured at the bite force of 0, 3, 6, and 9 kgf with a hand-held hardness meter. Then, the subjects were requested to exert a 9 kgf-clenching task for 30 seconds. The muscle hardness was again measured at 5, 30, and 120 seconds after the task, and the data obtained were compared with the muscle hardness before the clenching task.
RESULTS: The results showed that there was no significant difference between the patients and the normal controls, while the muscle hardness increased with contraction in all subjects. The present findings also showed that the patients had a delayed return to baseline after the clenching task compared with the normal subjects, although an immediate increase after the clenching task was seen in all subjects.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated that patients with masticatory myofascial pain have different muscle properties in the recovery phase after contraction, probably because of a slower intramuscular reperfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16413887     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Shear-wave sonoelastography for assessing masseter muscle hardness in comparison with strain sonoelastography: study with phantoms and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Yoshiko Ariji; Miwa Nakayama; Wataru Nishiyama; Michihito Nozawa; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Evaluation of the masseter muscle elasticity with the use of acoustic coupling agents as references in strain sonoelastography.

Authors:  M Nakayama; Y Ariji; W Nishiyama; E Ariji
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Prediction of the muscle strength by the muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasound muscle hardness meter.

Authors:  Satoshi Muraki; Kiyotaka Fukumoto; Osamu Fukuda
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-12

4.  Correlation of stress and muscle activity of patients with different degrees of temporomandibular disorder.

Authors:  Juliana de Paiva Tosato; Paulo Henrique Ferreira Caria; Cid Andre Fidelis de Paula Gomes; Fausto Berzin; Fabiano Politti; Tabajara de Oliveira Gonzalez; Daniela Aparecida Biasotto-Gonzalez
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 5.  Sonoelastography in the musculoskeletal system: Current role and future directions.

Authors:  Naomi Winn; Radhesh Lalam; Victor Cassar-Pullicino
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 6.  The usefulness of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of pain symptoms in temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Shigeaki Suenaga; Kunihiro Nagayama; Taisuke Nagasawa; Hiroko Indo; Hideyuki J Majima
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2016-09-05

Review 7.  [Feeling stiff…but what does it mean objectively? : Can you measure muscle tension?]

Authors:  A V Dieterich; A Haueise; L Gizzi
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 1.629

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.