Literature DB >> 16413652

Effect of reducing frequency of augmented feedback on manual dexterity training and its retention.

E Wierinck1, V Puttemans, D van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study addressed the impact of the frequency of tutorial-enriched augmented visual feedback, provided by a virtual simulation system (DentSim), on the skill acquisition for a cavity preparation task in novice dental students.
METHODS: Thirty-six subjects were assigned to two training groups and a control group. The task consisted of a geometrical cross preparation on the lower left first molar. All subjects performed a pre-test to assess their basic skill level. The training groups received simulation feedback, enriched with tutorial information, across acquisition. One group trained under continuous augmented feedback, while a second group trained under an intermittent (66% of the time) feedback. At both 1-day and 4-month interval, subjects performed a retention test to explore learning specific effects. Two transfer tests were added to assess the extrapolation of the learned skills to an adjacent molar. All tests were performed in the absence of feedback. A control group performed all the tests, without preceding training. All preparations were graded by the simulation system.
RESULTS: The training groups performed similarly across acquisition and improved with practice (ANOVA, P<0.001). After 1 day and 4 months of no practice, the training groups outperformed the control group on a retention test (ANOVA, P<0.001) and transfer test (ANOVA, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Performance and learning of a cavity preparation task on a simulation unit was independent of the frequency of tutorial-enriched augmented visual feedback within the range tested. Training sessions on a simulation unit could be alternated with training sessions in the traditional phantom head laboratory.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16413652     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  6 in total

1.  Learning kinematic mappings in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

2.  Outcome errors are not necessary for learning orthopedic bone drilling.

Authors:  Mykola Khokhotva; David Backstein; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Learning Kinematic Constraints in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.487

4.  Influence of motivation and a new digitized training program on undergraduate dental students during preclinical scaling training.

Authors:  Miriam Seidel; Simone Sutor; Jonas Conrad; Anne Sophie Engel; Antje Geiken; Sonja Sälzer; Christian Graetz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected motor learning principles in physiotherapy and medical education.

Authors:  Martin Sattelmayer; Simone Elsig; Roger Hilfiker; Gillian Baer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Effectiveness of technology-enhanced teaching and assessment methods of undergraduate preclinical dental skills: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Khaled Khalaf; Mohamed El-Kishawi; Shahd Mustafa; Sausan Al Kawas
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.