Literature DB >> 16413398

Myeloablative and immunosuppressive properties of treosulfan in mice.

Fredrik Sjöö1, Zuzana Hassan, Manuchehr Abedi-Valugerdi, Laimonas Griskevicius, Christina Nilsson, Mats Remberger, Johan Aschan, Hernan Concha, Una Gaughan, Moustapha Hassan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treosulfan is a prodrug with a specific clinical activity in ovarian carcinoma and other solid tumors. Due to its myeloablative and immunosuppressive effects, its use in conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic stem cell treatment (SCT) has been proposed. In the present preclinical study, myeloablative as well as immunosuppressive properties of treosulfan were compared with those of busulfan and cyclophosphamide.
METHODS: Three groups of BALB/c mice were treated with treosulfan, cyclophosphamide, or busulfan at sublethal doses that maintained survival without bone marrow support. The control group was left untreated. At different intervals, colony-forming unit granulocyte macrophage assay was performed on marrow cells. Additionally, immunological analyses were performed using spleen cells.
RESULTS: We found that treosulfan and busulfan induced a high and persisting degree of myeloablation, as compared with cyclophosphamide. Moreover, treosulfan was more effective in depletion of splenic B and T cells in comparison with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Furthermore, T cells isolated from the spleens of treosulfan- or busulfan-treated mice were not responsive to allogeneic cells compared with that observed in controls and cyclophosphamide-treated mice. Treatment with treosulfan induced only interleukin-2 production in spleen cells for a short time and had no significant effect on synthesis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and/or interferon-gamma as compared with that observed in splenic T cells isolated from mice treated with either busulfan or cyclophosphamide.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that treosulfan possesses both myeloablative and immunosuppressive properties and may be used as a single agent for conditioning prior to bone marrow transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16413398     DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Hematol        ISSN: 0301-472X            Impact factor:   3.084


  20 in total

1.  Human hepatocytes and hematolymphoid dual reconstitution in treosulfan-conditioned uPA-NOG mice.

Authors:  Tanuja L Gutti; Jaclyn S Knibbe; Edward Makarov; Jinjin Zhang; Govardhana R Yannam; Santhi Gorantla; Yimin Sun; David F Mercer; Hiroshi Suemizu; James L Wisecarver; Natalia A Osna; Tatiana K Bronich; Larisa Y Poluektova
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Comparison of algorithms for oral busulphan area under the concentration-time curve limited sampling estimate.

Authors:  Fredrik Sjöö; Ibrahim El-Serafi; Jon Enestig; Jonas Mattsson; Johan Liwing; Moustapha Hassan
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Modelling of neutrophil dynamics in children receiving busulfan or treosulfan for haematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; Robert Chiesa; Bilyana Doncheva; Helen Prunty; Paul Veys; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Joseph F Standing
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Reduced-toxicity conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: final results of an international prospective phase II trial.

Authors:  Tapani Ruutu; Liisa Volin; Dietrich W Beelen; Rudolf Trenschel; Juergen Finke; Marc Schnitzler; Jerzy Holowiecki; Sebastian Giebel; Miroslaw Markiewicz; Lutz Uharek; Igor W Blau; Joachim Kienast; Matthias Stelljes; Kajsa Larsson; Axel R Zander; Martin Gramatzki; Roland Repp; Hermann Einsele; Gernot Stuhler; Joachim Baumgart; Heidrun A Mylius; Uwe Pichlmeier; Mathias Freund; Jochen Casper
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Links between progressive HIV-1 infection of humanized mice and viral neuropathogenesis.

Authors:  Santhi Gorantla; Edward Makarov; Jennifer Finke-Dwyer; Antonio Castanedo; Adelina Holguin; Catherine L Gebhart; Howard E Gendelman; Larisa Poluektova
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with non-malignant diseases.

Authors:  M A Slatter; H Boztug; U Pötschger; K-W Sykora; A Lankester; I Yaniv; P Sedlacek; E Glogova; P Veys; A R Gennery; C Peters
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 7.  [Update on pathophysiologic and immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  C Kleinschnitz; S G Meuth; B C Kieseier; H Wiendl
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Fludarabine and treosulfan compared with other reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  R Yerushalmi; N Shem-Tov; I Danylesko; A Avigdor; A Nagler; A Shimoni
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Treatment of active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with treosulfan.

Authors:  Heinz Wiendl; Bernd C Kieseier; Robert Weissert; Heidrun A Mylius; Uwe Pichlmeier; Hans-Peter Hartung; Arthur Melms; Wilhelm Kuker; Michael Weller
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Treosulfan-based conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation for nonmalignant diseases: a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Lauri M Burroughs; Eneida R Nemecek; Troy R Torgerson; Barry E Storer; Julie-An Talano; Jennifer Domm; Roger H Giller; Akiko Shimamura; Colleen Delaney; Suzanne Skoda-Smith; Monica S Thakar; K Scott Baker; David J Rawlings; Janet A Englund; Mary E D Flowers; H Joachim Deeg; Rainer Storb; Ann E Woolfrey
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.