Literature DB >> 16413345

Relationship between primary Gleason pattern on needle biopsy and clinicopathologic outcomes among men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Mark L Gonzalgo1, Patrick J Bastian, Leslie A Mangold, Bruce J Trock, Jonathan I Epstein, Patrick C Walsh, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship among needle biopsy primary grade, prostatectomy grade, and postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence among men with Gleason score 7 disease.
METHODS: We identified 320 men with Gleason score 7 tumors on prostate biopsy treated with radical prostatectomy between 1991 and 2001 by a single surgeon. None of these patients had received neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy or radiotherapy. The chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate the correlation among biopsy Gleason score, prostatectomy Gleason score, and biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 252 (79%) and 68 (21%) men had primary Gleason pattern 3 and 4 identified on needle biopsy, respectively. Of the patients with Gleason pattern 3 + 4 tumors on biopsy, 24% were upgraded to primary pattern 4 or more on final pathologic analysis. Of the patients with Gleason pattern 4 + 3 tumors on biopsy, 47% were downgraded to primary pattern 3 or less on final pathologic analysis. The actuarial risk of biochemical prostate-specific antigen recurrence was significantly lower among patients with Gleason pattern 4 + 3 on biopsy, if the prostatectomy Gleason score was downgraded to 3 + 4 or less (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 47% of men with a diagnosis of Gleason pattern 4 + 3 on needle biopsy are downgraded at radical prostatectomy and will have biochemical prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free outcomes similar to patients originally diagnosed with Gleason pattern 3 + 4 adenocarcinoma. This group of patients may benefit from definitive treatment such as radical prostatectomy for management of their disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16413345     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; L Egevad; M Amin; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; P A Humphrey; J I Epstein
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  GSTP1 promoter methylation is associated with recurrence in early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leonel Maldonado; Mariana Brait; Myriam Loyo; Lauren Sullenberger; Kevin Wang; Sarah B Peskoe; Eli Rosenbaum; Roslyn Howard; Antoun Toubaji; Roula Albadine; George J Netto; Mohammad O Hoque; Elizabeth A Platz; David Sidransky
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Pathological Correlation between Number of Biopsies and Radical Surgery: Does It Make a Difference to Final Pathology?

Authors:  Tahir Qayyum; Jennifer M Willder; Paul G Horgan; Joanne Edwards; Mark A Underwood
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-07-28

4.  Detection of aggressive prostate cancer associated glycoproteins in urine using glycoproteomics and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xingwang Jia; Jing Chen; Shisheng Sun; Weiming Yang; Shuang Yang; Punit Shah; Naseruddin Hoti; Bob Veltri; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  The impact of surgical downgrading on prostate cancer recurrence: systematic review and analysis of a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Denzel Zhu; William Shyr; Michelle Toker; Ethan Fram; Jinrong Cheng; Evan Z Kovac; Ilir Agalliu; Ahmed Aboumohamed; Kara L Watts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Risk stratification of men with Gleason score 7 to 10 tumors by primary and secondary Gleason score: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  David E Kang; Nicholas J Fitzsimons; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Pathological correlation between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad A Bulbul; Yaser El-Hout; Maurice Haddad; Ayman Tawil; Ali Houjaij; Nizar Bou Diab; Oussama Darwish
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Higher prostate weight is inversely associated with Gleason score upgrading in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Emerson Luis Zani; Leandro L L Freitas; Fernandes Denardi; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-10-31

9.  The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Ye Chen; Lin-Kun Hu; Chang-Chuan Jiang; Ren-Fang Xu; Xiao-Zhou He
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8-10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system.

Authors:  Yuan Zhou; Changming Lin; Zhihua Hu; Cheng Yang; Rentao Zhang; Yinman Ding; Zhengquan Wang; Sha Tao; Yanmei Qin
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.