Literature DB >> 16412441

Os acromiale: population differences and their etiological significance.

D T Case1, S E Burnett, T Nielsen.   

Abstract

The os acromiale is an accessory bone resulting from failure of the acromial apophysis to fuse to the scapula. It is a relatively frequent defect affecting 4-18% of most large skeletal series. The etiology of os acromiale is poorly understood, and two competing hypotheses have been proposed: (1) that the accessory bone represents a genetic defect, and (2) that it results from mechanical stress on the developing acromion. In order to assess the evidence for these two hypotheses, os acromiale frequencies from a South African cadaver sample (n = 494) were compared to frequencies from a medieval Danish archaeological sample (n = 532). The South African frequency (18.2%) was significantly higher than the medieval Danish frequency (7.7%, p < 0.0001). These results mirror those of another study comparing African- and Euro-Americans, and tend to support the genetic hypothesis. However, a left side bias (72%) was also found among the South Africans (p = 0.013), lending some support to the mechanical stress hypothesis. Sex and age biases were also examined but were not found. In order to further test the mechanical hypothesis, the medieval Danes were divided into groups of higher and lower socioeconomic status based upon cemetery type. Lower status individuals were presumed to have engaged in strenuous labor activities more often and at a younger age than higher status individuals. However, comparison of these two groups failed to demonstrate a significant frequency difference (p = 0.105). Based on the results of this study, it is suggested that a third etiology combining a genetic predisposition for os acromiale with mechanical stress as the proximate cause should also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16412441     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2005.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Homo        ISSN: 0018-442X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Variant anatomy of the shoulder on MRI.

Authors:  Min Wang; Wei Shen; Ren-Fa Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 2.  Os acromiale: frequency and a review of 726 shoulder MRI.

Authors:  C Rovesta; M C Marongiu; A Corradini; P Torricelli; G Ligabue
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-25

3.  Os acromiale as a cause for shoulder pain in a competitive swimmer: a case report.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  The prevalence of os acromiale in Korean patients visiting shoulder clinic.

Authors:  Jayant Kumar; Won Ha Park; Seung-Ho Kim; Hyun Il Lee; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-08-20

Review 5.  Os Acromiale: Reviews and Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Tian You; Simon Frostick; Wen-Tao Zhang; Qi Yin
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Prevalence of Os Acromiale in Thai Patients With Shoulder Problems: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Peemmawat Phanichwong; Adinun Apivatgaroon; Waraporn Srikhum Boonsaeng
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-24

7.  Os acromiale: prevalence and associated patient-related factors-a population-based study of three thousand and fifty participants.

Authors:  Cornelius Sebastian Fischer; Matthias Floß; Till Ittermann; Robin Bülow; Henry Völzke; Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Jörn Lange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.479

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.