Literature DB >> 16411794

The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.

Benjamin Munson1, Beth A Kurtz, Jennifer Windsor.   

Abstract

Research has shown that children repeat high-probability phoneme sequences more accurately than low-probability ones. This effect attenuates with age, and its decrease is predicted by developmental changes in the size of the lexicon (J. Edwards, M. E. Beckman, & B. Munson, 2004; B. Munson, 2001; B. Munson, J. Edwards, & M. Beckman, 2005). This study expands on these findings by examining relationships between vocabulary size and repetition accuracy of nonwords varying in phonotactic probability by 16 children with specific language impairment (SLI), 16 chronological-age-matched (CA) peers with typical speech and language development, and 16 younger children matched with the children with SLI on vocabulary size (VS). As in previous research, children with SLI repeated nonwords less accurately than did CA children. The children with SLI and the VS children showed similar levels of nonword repetition accuracy. Phonotactic probability affected repetition accuracy more for children with SLI and VS children than for CA children. Regression analyses showed that measures of vocabulary size were the best predictor of the difference in repetition accuracy between high- and low-probability sequences. Analyses by items showed that measures of phonotactic probability were stronger predictors of repetition accuracy than judgments of wordlikeness. Taken together, the results support research demonstrating that vocabulary size mediates the influence of phonotactic probability on nonword repetition, perhaps due to its influence on the ongoing refinement of phonological categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16411794     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/072)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  60 in total

1.  Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Beyond phonotactic frequency: presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.

Authors:  Elena Plante; Megha Bahl; Rebecca Vance; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Phonological Working Memory for Words and Nonwords in Cerebral Cortex.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Satrajit S Ghosh; Irina Ostrovskaya; John D E Gabrieli; Ioulia Kovelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Nonword repetition skills in young children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich; Nancy E Hall
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI).

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Role of working memory in typically developing children's complex sentence comprehension.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Beula M Magimairaj; Michelle H O'Malley
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09

9.  Explaining Individual Differences in Trajectories of Simultaneous Bilingual Development: Contributions of Child and Environmental Factors.

Authors:  Justin Lauro; Cynthia Core; Erika Hoff
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2020-08-01

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.