Literature DB >> 16411143

Outcomes of mass screening for gastric carcinoma.

Chikara Kunisaki1, Junko Ishino, Susumu Nakajima, Hisahiko Motohashi, Hirotoshi Akiyama, Masato Nomura, Goro Matsuda, Yuichi Otsuka, Hidetaka Andrew Ono, Hiroshi Shimada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic results of gastric cancer have been improved by early detection of gastric cancer with the mass screening system in Japan. The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of mass screening for gastric cancer by using a barium meal.
METHODS: A series of 1050 patients (364 in the screened group and 686 in the nonscreened group) were included in this study from April 1992 to March 2000. Patient characteristics, therapeutic results, and prognostic factors were compared in the two groups.
RESULTS: The screened patients tended to be younger and male, with tumors in the middle third of the stomach that were of a macroscopically superficial type, with a smaller diameter, and at an earlier stage. They had fewer metastatic lymph nodes and underwent more frequent curative resection. Among the screened patients with curatively resected disease, tumors tended to be of a smaller diameter, and there were fewer metastatic lymph nodes in both early and advanced cases. Disease-specific survival was significantly better in the screened cases among all registered and curatively resected patients. Mass screening achieved significantly better surgical results in early or advanced gastric cancer patients who received curative resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that mass screening was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, .3949; P < .0001), together with depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, age, and tumor diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: Mass screening by using barium meal examination for gastric cancer detects cancer at an early stage and produces good therapeutic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16411143     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

1.  Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: an evaluation using a questionnaire mailed to the patients.

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Daisuke Korenaga; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Kenichi Kohshi; Keishi Sugimachi; Yoshihiro Nagao; Norifumi Tsutsumi; Kenji Takenaka; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Makoto Hashizume; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Surveillance strategy of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in a country with a high prevalence of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Woon Geon Shin; Heung Up Kim; Ho June Song; Su Jin Hong; Ki-Nam Shim; In-Kyung Sung; Jae Gyu Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A newly modified esophagogastrostomy with a reliable angle of His by placing a gastric tube in the lower mediastinum in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Yasuda; Takushi Yasuda; Haruhiko Imamoto; Hiroaki Kato; Kohei Nishiki; Mitsuru Iwama; Tomoki Makino; Osamu Shiraishi; Masayuki Shinkai; Motohiro Imano; Hiroshi Furukawa; Kiyokata Okuno; Hitoshi Shiozaki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Randomized controlled trial comparing gastric cancer screening by gastrointestinal X-ray with serology for Helicobacter pylori and pepsinogens followed by gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Takuji Gotoda; Hideki Ishikawa; Hirohide Ohnishi; Kentaro Sugano; Chika Kusano; Chizu Yokoi; Yutaka Matsuyama; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the middle stomach: technical report and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Koshi Kumagai; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Sayuri Sekikawa; Takehiro Chiba; Takashi Kiyokawa; Xiaohua Jiang; Shinya Tanimura; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Endoscopic removal of an impacted barolith at the sigmoid colon: a rare case report.

Authors:  Tomoya Iida; Takehiro Hirano; Kei Onodera; Toshiyuki Kubo; Kentaro Yamashita; Hiroo Yamano; Hiroshi Nakase
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-06

7.  Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Masazumi Takahashi; Masami Ikeda; Satoshi Inagawa; Shugo Ueda; Takayuki Nobuoka; Manabu Ota; Yoshiaki Iwasaki; Nobuyuki Uchida; Yasuhiro Kodera; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Evaluation and treatment of malignant ascites secondary to gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiromichi Maeda; Michiya Kobayashi; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Use of a clinical pathway in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hee Sung Kim; Sun Oak Kim; Byung Sik Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Does age matter in the indication for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy?

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Akira Miki; Shigekazu Ohyama; Yasuyuki Seto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.