Literature DB >> 1641112

Facial nerve repair by interposition nerve graft: results in 22 patients.

E Stephanian1, L N Sekhar, I P Janecka, B Hirsch.   

Abstract

Resection of tumors of the posterior cranial base may incorporate a segment of the facial nerve because of tumor infiltration, or may result in unplanned nerve injury. Immediate repair of the facial nerve by resuture or with an autogenous nerve graft is highly desirable to ensure optimal recovery of facial function. Twenty-four patients who underwent extensive surgery of the posterior skull base and facial nerve reconstruction were studied. Of these, 12 patients had preoperative facial weakness and 3 had facial palsy. All patients underwent graft reconstruction from the subarachnoid or labyrinthine portion of the facial nerve to the fallopian or extracranial segment. The greater auricular nerve was used as a graft in 14 patients, and the sural nerve in 10. Two patients died of their disease soon after surgery, and, therefore, were excluded from our follow-up. In the remaining 22 patients, the median follow-up time was 20 months. As evaluated by the House-Brackmann grading system, 45% (10/22) of the surviving patients achieved a good recovery of facial function, 36% (8/22) attained a fair recovery, and 18% (4/22) had minimal or no recovery. There was no statistical correlation between the length of the graft used and the degree or timing of clinical recovery. The surgical result obtained in all patients with complete preoperative facial palsy and in one patient with dense facial paresis was poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641112     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199207000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  7 in total

1.  Repair of the facial nerve in the cerebellopontine angle using freeze-thawed skeletal muscle autografts. An experimental surgical study in the sheep.

Authors:  M A Glasby; R E Clutton; S J Drew; M G O'Sullivan; I R Whittle
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Facial nerve repair: the impact of technical variations on the final outcome.

Authors:  María Sánchez-Ocando; Javier Gavilán; Julio Penarrocha; Teresa González-Otero; Susana Moraleda; José María Roda; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  A comprehensive review of the great auricular nerve graft.

Authors:  Cassidy Werner; Anthony V D'Antoni; Joe Iwanaga; Koichi Watanabe; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Outcomes and prognostic factors of facial nerve repair: a retrospective comparative study of 31 patients and literature review.

Authors:  Fabienne Carré; Rémi Hervochon; Ghizlene Lahlou; Diane Lastennet; Peggy Gatignol; Daniele Bernardeschi; Georges Lamas; Frédéric Tankéré
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Indication, technique and results of facial nerve reconstruction.

Authors:  M Samii; C Matthies
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Intratemporal Grafting of the Facial Nerve following Lateral Skull Base Tumor Resection.

Authors:  John P Leonetti; Douglas E Anderson; Sam J Marzo; Thomas C Origitano; Guy J Petruzzelli
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-05

Review 7.  Donors for nerve transplantation in craniofacial soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  Sishuai Sun; Di Lu; Hanlin Zhong; Chao Li; Ning Yang; Bin Huang; Shilei Ni; Xingang Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.