Literature DB >> 16410373

Differential effects of strength training leading to failure versus not to failure on hormonal responses, strength, and muscle power gains.

Mikel Izquierdo1, Javier Ibañez, Juan José González-Badillo, Keijo Häkkinen, Nicholas A Ratamess, William J Kraemer, Duncan N French, Jesus Eslava, Aritz Altadill, Xabier Asiain, Esteban M Gorostiaga.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 11 wk of resistance training to failure vs. nonfailure, followed by an identical 5-wk peaking period of maximal strength and power training for both groups as well as to examine the underlying physiological changes in basal circulating anabolic and catabolic hormones. Forty-two physically active men were matched and then randomly assigned to either a training to failure (RF; n = 14), nonfailure (NRF; n = 15), or control groups (C; n = 13). Muscular and power testing and blood draws to determine basal hormonal concentrations were conducted before the initiation of training (T0), after 6 wk of training (T1), after 11 wk of training (T2), and after 16 wk of training (T3). Both RF and NRF resulted in similar gains in 1-repetition maximum bench press (23 and 23%) and parallel squat (22 and 23%), muscle power output of the arm (27 and 28%) and leg extensor muscles (26 and 29%), and maximal number of repetitions performed during parallel squat (66 and 69%). RF group experienced larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions performed during the bench press. The peaking phase (T2 to T3) after NRF resulted in larger gains in muscle power output of the lower extremities, whereas after RF it resulted in larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions performed during the bench press. Strength training leading to RF resulted in reductions in resting concentrations of IGF-1 and elevations in IGFBP-3, whereas NRF resulted in reduced resting cortisol concentrations and an elevation in resting serum total testosterone concentration. This investigation demonstrated a potential beneficial stimulus of NRF for improving strength and power, especially during the subsequent peaking training period, whereas performing sets to failure resulted in greater gains in local muscular endurance. Elevation in IGFBP-3 after resistance training may have been compensatory to accommodate the reduction in IGF-1 to preserve IGF availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16410373     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01400.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  53 in total

1.  SHBG, plasma, and urinary androgens in weight lifters after a strength training.

Authors:  Marcos Maynar; Rafael Timon; Alfredo González; Guillermo Olcina; Fermin Toribio; Juan I Maynar; Maria J Caballero
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.158

2.  Time course responses of serum GH, insulin, IGF-1, IGFBP1, and IGFBP3 concentrations after heavy resistance exercise in trained and untrained men.

Authors:  Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar; Ehsan Soleymani Far; Ramin Heshmat; Hamid Rajabi; Hassan Kosari
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Effect of high versus low-velocity resistance training on muscular fitness and functional performance in older men.

Authors:  Martim Bottaro; Samyra N Machado; Wanderson Nogueira; Robert Scales; João Veloso
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Endurance and neuromuscular changes in world-class level kayakers during a periodized training cycle.

Authors:  Jesús García-Pallarés; Luis Sánchez-Medina; Luis Carrasco; Arturo Díaz; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Strategies to optimize concurrent training of strength and aerobic fitness for rowing and canoeing.

Authors:  Jesús García-Pallarés; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Exercise with blood flow restriction: an updated evidence-based approach for enhanced muscular development.

Authors:  Brendan R Scott; Jeremy P Loenneke; Katie M Slattery; Ben J Dascombe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Chronic Effects of Altering Resistance Training Set Configurations Using Cluster Sets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy B Davies; Derek L Tran; Clorinda M Hogan; G Gregory Haff; Christopher Latella
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Urinary steroid profile after the completion of concentric and concentric/eccentric trials with the same total workload.

Authors:  R Timon; G Olcina; P Tomas-Carus; D Muñoz; F Toribio; A Raimundo; M Maynar
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 9.  Testosterone physiology in resistance exercise and training: the up-stream regulatory elements.

Authors:  Jakob L Vingren; William J Kraemer; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jeffrey M Anderson; Jeff S Volek; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failure.

Authors:  Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Carlos E Pérez; Ricardo Mora-Rodríguez; Ernesto de la Cruz-Sánchez; Juan José González-Badillo; Luis Sánchez-Medina; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.