PURPOSE: The optimal minimally invasive treatment for small renal masses continues to evolve. Current ablative technologies rely on thermal mechanisms for tissue destruction. However, the creation of precise lesions is limited by inhomogeneous heating/cooling due to tissue variability, perfusion effects and tissue charring. We hypothesized that nonthermal mechanical effects of ultrasound (cavitation) can be used to progressively homogenize tissue in controlled fashion with predictable results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a focused annular array ultrasound system capable of delivering high intensity (greater than 20 kW/cm) short pulses (20 microseconds) of energy to a target volume. This system operates at a repetition frequency of 100 Hz, resulting in a low time averaged power output (approximately 5 W total acoustic output). Following approval from the institutional animal care committee a series of transcutaneous ablations were performed in the normal kidneys of 10 rabbits. RESULTS: Lesions created with a small number of pulses (10 or 100) produced scattered areas of damage characterized by focal hemorrhage and small areas of cellular injury in the targeted volume. Lesions created with greater numbers of pulses (1,000 or 10,000) demonstrated complete destruction of the targeted volume. Gross examination revealed that lesions contained a liquefied core with smooth walls and sharply demarcated boundaries. Histological examination demonstrated extensive areas of acellular debris surrounded by a narrow margin of cellular injury. CONCLUSIONS: This pulsed cavitational ultrasound system is capable of transcutaneous nonthermal destruction of renal tissue. Refinement of this technology for noninvasive ablation of small renal masses is currently under way.
PURPOSE: The optimal minimally invasive treatment for small renal masses continues to evolve. Current ablative technologies rely on thermal mechanisms for tissue destruction. However, the creation of precise lesions is limited by inhomogeneous heating/cooling due to tissue variability, perfusion effects and tissue charring. We hypothesized that nonthermal mechanical effects of ultrasound (cavitation) can be used to progressively homogenize tissue in controlled fashion with predictable results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a focused annular array ultrasound system capable of delivering high intensity (greater than 20 kW/cm) short pulses (20 microseconds) of energy to a target volume. This system operates at a repetition frequency of 100 Hz, resulting in a low time averaged power output (approximately 5 W total acoustic output). Following approval from the institutional animal care committee a series of transcutaneous ablations were performed in the normal kidneys of 10 rabbits. RESULTS: Lesions created with a small number of pulses (10 or 100) produced scattered areas of damage characterized by focal hemorrhage and small areas of cellular injury in the targeted volume. Lesions created with greater numbers of pulses (1,000 or 10,000) demonstrated complete destruction of the targeted volume. Gross examination revealed that lesions contained a liquefied core with smooth walls and sharply demarcated boundaries. Histological examination demonstrated extensive areas of acellular debris surrounded by a narrow margin of cellular injury. CONCLUSIONS: This pulsed cavitational ultrasound system is capable of transcutaneous nonthermal destruction of renal tissue. Refinement of this technology for noninvasive ablation of small renal masses is currently under way.
Authors: Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Alexander P Duryea; Timothy L Hall; Adam D Maxwell; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts Journal: J Endourol Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Emily A Knott; John F Swietlik; Katherine C Longo; Rao F Watson; Chelsey M Green; E Jason Abel; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Amanda R Smolock; Zhen Xu; Fred T Lee; Timothy J Ziemlewicz Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Tyler Gerhardson; Jonathan R Sukovich; Aditya S Pandey; Timothy L Hall; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Eli Vlaisavljevich; Kuang-Wei Lin; Adam Maxwell; Matthew T Warnez; Lauren Mancia; Rahul Singh; Andrew J Putnam; Brian Fowlkes; Eric Johnsen; Charles Cain; Zhen Xu Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Jonathan J Macoskey; Timothy L Hall; Jonathan R Sukovich; Sang Won Choi; Kimberly Ives; Eric Johnsen; Charles A Cain; Zhen Xu Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 2.725