Literature DB >> 16406927

Rectosigmoid pouch (Mainz Pouch II) in children.

Sascha Pahernik1, Rolf Beetz, Jörg Schede, Raimund Stein, Joachim W Thüroff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continent anal urinary diversion is a therapeutic option in bladder exstrophy. We report our long-term results with the rectosigmoid pouch (Mainz pouch II), a modification of the classic ureterosigmoidostomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 children with a mean age of 5 years (range 0.5 to 17) underwent a Mainz pouch II procedure between 1991 and 2004. Most patients (33) had bladder exstrophy or incontinent epispadias. In 14 children (37%) urinary diversion was performed after failed primary reconstruction. In 6 children conversion was performed from an incontinent type of urinary diversion. Renal function, continence and metabolic changes were analyzed. A total of 35 children were followed for a mean of 112 months (range 5 to 147).
RESULTS: All children were continent during the daytime but 3 (8.6%) suffered from nighttime incontinence requiring pads. With respect to the upper urinary tract, 6 children (15.8%) had development of pyelonephritis, mostly with stenosis of the ureterointestinal anastomosis. Reimplantation of the ureter was required in 10 of 69 RU (14.5%), of which 7 (10.1%) were due to ureterointestinal stenosis and 3 (4.3%) were due to reflux. Serum creatinine was within normal limits in all children. During followup acid-base balance was monitored, and early alkali supplementation was initiated in 24 of 35 children (69%) when the base excess was less than -2.5 mmol/l. One child had development of clinical acidosis requiring hospitalization. After followup of more than 10 years annual rectosigmoidoscopy was performed in 16 children/young adults without pathological findings.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mainz pouch II procedure for children with genitourinary anomalies promises excellent continence rates. However, periodic followup studies are important to check the upper urinary tract and prevent metabolic acidosis. Due to the risk of malignancy at the ureterointestinal anastomosis, endoscopy should be performed annually beginning at postoperative year 10. The Mainz pouch II procedure is safe in the long term. Without stoma, appliance or catheterization this type of continent urinary diversion is specifically suitable for children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16406927     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00035-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  [Bladder exstrophy--epispadias complex. New goals--new ways?].

Authors:  W H Rösch; A Ebert; G Schott
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [The history of ureterosigmoidostomy].

Authors:  S C Müller; P J Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Urinary diversion in childhood: special attention to the long-term consequences and complications].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Surgical urinary diversion in children from war and crisis areas-20-year experience report].

Authors:  J Kranz; M Dück; C Steffens; B Reisch; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Exstrophy Bladder - Reconstruction or Diversion for the Underprivileged.

Authors:  Yogesh Kumar Sarin; Virender Sekhon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  Urinary diversion--approaches and consequences.

Authors:  Raimund Stein; Markus Hohenfellner; Sascha Pahernik; Stephan Roth; Joachim W Thüroff; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Experience with a low-pressure colonic pouch (Mainz II) urinary diversion for irreparable vesicovaginal fistula and bladder extrophy in East Africa.

Authors:  Mark A Morgan; Mary Lake Polan; Habte H Melecot; Berhane Debru; Ambereen Sleemi; Amreen Husain
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-17

Review 8.  [Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion in children and adolescents].

Authors:  R Stein; L Wessel; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Urinary diversions: which one one is right for which patient?].

Authors:  P Bader; D Westermann; D Frohneberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  The exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Authors:  Anne-Karoline Ebert; Heiko Reutter; Michael Ludwig; Wolfgang H Rösch
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.123

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.